Ancient history

What the Irish thought of executions after Easter rising?

After the Easter Rising in 1916, executions became a major bone of contention between the British government and the Irish population

Initial Outrage and Protests:

Irish public was outraged by the executions of the rebellion leaders, including Patrick Pearse, James Connolly, and others. Public opinion broadly condemned the executions believing them to be cruel, unjust, and excessive punishment for a political rebellion that didn't result in significant casualties.

Increasing Support for Independence:

The executions had the unintended effect of rallying the public behind the cause of Irish independence. In many ways, the executions became seen as symbolic acts of oppression by the British government, solidifying Irish nationalistic sentiments.

Sympathy for the Cause:

The brutal nature of the executions, where some leaders such as James Connolly were executed even though he was wounded, fueled public sympathy for the Irish cause. This contributed to the growing support for separatism and republicanism among the general population.

International Attention:

The international community also took note of the executions and condemned Britain for its heavy-handed approach. This further strengthened the international case for Irish independence and gained moral support from other countries.

Legacy of Bitterness:

The memory of the executions left a lasting legacy of bitterness and resentment in the minds of many Irish. They were seen as martyrs and heroes who had been unjustifiably put to death, reinforcing hostile attitudes toward British rule.

In conclusion, the aftermath of the Easter Rising and the executions of its leaders created a deeply emotional response among the Irish population, fueling the nationalistic drive for Irish independence and leaving a lasting impact on Irish history and identity.