Official history, on the other hand, refers specifically to the historical accounts that are endorsed or sanctioned by a government or ruling authority. It often represents the perspective and interests of those in power, and focuses on major political events, institutional narratives, and the glorification of national achievements and leaders. Official histories tend to be more selective and emphasize the positive aspects while downplaying or omitting events or viewpoints that may be controversial or contrary to the desired image.
Here are some key differences between history and official history:
1. Objectivity and Bias: History aims for objectivity and strives to present multiple viewpoints and interpretations, whereas official history is intentionally biased towards the dominant perspective of the ruling authority. It may overlook or suppress certain events or narratives that do not align with the official version.
2. Control and Interpretation: History is a more decentralized and diverse field, with different historians offering their analyses, interpretations, and critiques. In contrast, official history is often controlled and regulated by the government or other authorities, which exerts influence over the presentation and interpretation of historical events and narratives.
3. Inclusiveness: History generally seeks to include a wide range of perspectives, experiences, and voices from different social and cultural groups. Official history may be selective and focus on a narrow narrative centered on the dominant group, excluding marginalized voices or opposing views.
4. Purpose and Scope: History encompasses all aspects of the past and is concerned with understanding and exploring various historical phenomena. Official history is more limited in scope and purpose, as its primary objetivo is to present a version of history that aligns with the political and ideological interests of the ruling authority.
5. Access and Dissemination: History is accessible to a wide audience and is often the product of academic research, historical scholarship, and various forms of historical writing and media. Official histories, on the other hand, may be restricted in terms of access, as they are subject to government control and censorship.
In essence, while history is a comprehensive and dynamic field that embraces diverse perspectives and methodologies, official history is more selective and influenced by political and institutional agendas, aiming to present a particular narrative sanctioned by the authorities in power.