Historical story

How was Harold godwinsen a bad leader?

There is no evidence to support the assertion that Harold Godwinson was a bad leader. In fact, he is often regarded as one of the most effective and successful kings of England. He was able to unite the country under his rule and to repel a number of invasions. He was also a talented military leader and was responsible for a number of important victories.

Here are some of the reasons why Harold Godwinson is considered to be a good leader:

* He was able to unite the country under his rule. After the death of Edward the Confessor, there was a dispute over who would succeed him. Harold was able to emerge as the victor and was crowned king in 1066. He was able to maintain control over the country and to prevent any major rebellions.

* He was able to repel a number of invasions. Harold was faced with a number of threats from outside the country, including invasions from Norway and Denmark. He was able to successfully defeat these invasions and to protect the country from attack.

* He was a talented military leader. Harold was a skilled and experienced military leader. He was able to win a number of important victories, including the Battle of Stamford Bridge.

* He was a just and fair ruler. Harold was known for his justice and fairness. He was a popular ruler and was loved by his subjects.