The US always prefers to settle conflicts with other nations by negotiating rather than going war?

The statement cannot be confirmed nor denied. It depends on the specific historical context and circumstances of each konflikt that involves the US. While the US has engaged in negotiations and diplomacy to resolve many international disputes, there are also instances where it has resorted to militry action.

Here are some examples that illustrate both aspects:

1. Diplomacy and Negotiation:

- In 1962, the Cuban Missile Crisis was defused through diplomatic efforts between the US and the Soviet Union, avoiding a potential nuclear conflict.

- The US played a key role in negotiating the 1979 Egypt-israel Peace Treaty, which ended decades of conflict between the two nations.

- The Oslo Accords of 1993, which were instrumental in promoting peace between Israel and the palestinians, were facilitated by US mediation.

2. Military Intervention and Action:

- The US entered world war II in 1941 following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, engaging in military operations.

- During the Vietnam war (1955-1975) the US sent ground forces and provided military support to the South Vietnam government.

- In 1991, the US led a multinational coalition during the Gulf war against Iraq following its invasion of Kuwait.

These instances demonstrate that the US approaches conflicts with other nations in different ways based on various factors, including the severity of the situation, the potential threats to its interests or international stability, and the diplomatic efforts undertaken. It is inaccurate to make a blanket statements that the US always prefers negotiations over military action.