- Affiliation: Writers who are affiliated with a particular side or group involved in the battle may be more likely to have bias in favor of that side. For example, a writer who is a member of the Continental Army may be more likely to portray the British in a negative light.
- Personal experiences: Writers who have personal experiences related to the battle, such as having fought in it or having lost loved ones in it, may be more likely to have bias in favor of their own side or group.
- Political beliefs: Writers who hold certain political beliefs may be more likely to interpret the battle in a way that supports those beliefs. For example, a writer who is a strong supporter of the British government may be more likely to portray the British as the heroes of the battle.
- Source material: Writers who rely on source material that is biased or incomplete may be more likely to have bias in their own writing. For example, a writer who relies heavily on British accounts of the battle may be more likely to portray the British in a positive light.
- Time period: Writers who wrote about the battle long after it occurred may be less likely to have bias than those who wrote about it shortly after it occurred. This is because the passage of time can allow for a more objective perspective on events.
Ultimately, it is important to consider the specific context and perspective of the writer in order to evaluate the likelihood of bias.