History of Asia

Is the Taj Mahal really a symbol of love and was built by Shah Jahan?

When Shah Jahan's second wife Arjumand Banu Begum alias Mumtaz was taking her last breath while giving birth to her 14th child, Shah Jahan was caught in the love trap of a 15-year-old famous dancer from Burhanpur and did not come. It was only when Asif Khan got that dancer killed, that Shah Jahan shook from there and before coming, he came after making her tomb which still exists.

Among the thousands of concubines of Shah Jahan, two Akbarabadi Begum and Kandhari Begum had the status of Shahi Begum. In Burhanpur in 1631, while giving birth to the 14th child, after Mumtaz's death, buried him there and returned to Delhi, he first married Mumtaz's sister and girlfriend / mistress Farzana Begum, but Shah Jahan did not stop in this. Shah Jahan was so infamous for his sexuality that many historians have blamed him for having sex with his own unmarried daughter Jahanara - the eminent nationalist historian and researcher Purushottam Nagesh Oak.

It is said that Jahanara, the eldest daughter of Shah Jahan and Mumtaz Mahal, looked exactly like her mother, that is why the dissolute Shah Jahan started suffering by trapping his own daughter Jahanara. Bernier wrote, “Begum Sahib, the elder daughter of Shah Jahan was very beautiful… Rumour has it that his attachment reached a point which it is difficult to believe, the justification of which he rested on the decision of the Mullahs, or doctors of their law. According to them it would have been unjust to deny the king the privilege of gathering fruit from the tree he himself had planted.”

Peter Mundi and Trebenier have also mentioned the illicit relations between Shah Jahan and Jahanara. However, historian KS Lal has defended Shah Jahan and said that Aurangzeb must have made rumors about the relationship between Shah Jahan and Jahanara by making a scandal, which can only be called leftist insanity to forcefully make Muslims great.

Astu, not only this, Shah Jahan did not allow any of Jahanara's lovers to beat him. Once, when Jahanara was fighting love with one of her lovers, Shah Jahan came, fearing that he hid in the tandoor of the harem. Shah Jahan set fire to the tandoor and burnt it alive. In fact, Akbar had made a rule that the daughters of the Mughal family would not be married. Historians give many reasons for this. The result of this was that the girls of the Mughal family used to take the help of courtiers, servants as well as relatives and even close relatives in an illegal way to satisfy their physical hunger. While Jahanara was the mistress of her own father Shah Jahan, the second daughter Roshanara was the mistress of Zindapir Aurangzeb. The third daughter Gauhar alias Mehrunnisa was caught in the affair of Shivaji's son Shambhaji.

Not only this, Jahanara also used to bring girls by trapping her for her lustful father. Jahanara, a 13-year-old Brahmin girl of Shah Jahan's astrologer, was called to his palace and handed over to her estranged father after getting intoxicated by fraud. When his eyes were opened due to the pain of sexual intercourse, he ran away in fear of being recognized, but that Brahmin Kumari showed the courage to recognize him and finally Shah Jahan had to marry that 13 year old Brahmin girl in the 58th year. Manucci wrote "it would seem as if the only thing Shahjahan cared for was the search for women to serve his pleasure" and "for this end he established a fair (Meena Bazar) at his court. No one was allowed to enter except women of all ranks that is to say, great and small, rich and poor, but all beautiful”.

There was also a sale of beautiful Hindu women and girls brought in captive in Meena Bazar, whose main buyer was the emperor and the royal family, which was running from the time of Akbar. In the same Meena Bazaar, Akbar tried to rape Man Singh's sister, Jahangir's wife and his daughter-in-law Manbai, but the brave Rajput Bala climbed on his chest with a dagger and gave him an oath not to commit such a mistake again. . He further writes, “Shah Jahan didn’t lose his “weakness for the flesh” even when he had grown very old,. Shah Jahan also had an affair with Farzana Begum, Mumtaz Mahal's sister”

A few years later, when he fell ill, Aurangzeb imprisoned him with his mistress Jahanara in the Agra Fort and, understanding his father's sexuality, allowed him to keep 40 concubines (royal prostitutes) with him. After coming to Delhi, you put a few selected wives / concubines out of thousands of concubines of your father in his harem and drove the rest out of the fort, whose children today adorn the red light area GB Road of Delhi.

One of those wives was a beautiful Bibi, the same Brahmin girl whom he was eager to make as his wife, but that Brahmin girl refused, citing a Hindu ritual of piety. Later, to avoid Aurangzeb's disillusionment, he poured acid on his face with his own hands (base:ruins speaking - Guru Dutt). Shah Jahan died in the Agra Fort on 22 January 1666 AD at the age of 74, according to The History Channel, due to consuming highly aphrodisiac drugs. That is, till the last time of his life, he was doing debauchery only.

The great nationalist historian PN OK has proved the Taj Mahal as the Shiv Mandir Tejo Mahalaya and no sly Nehruvian, leftist historian has dared to refute their concrete evidence. His discovery is described in the book "Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya". Actually the story of Taj Mahal and love has been fabricated by Nehruvian-leftist-jihadi sly historians so that people can be misled and especially hidden from Hindus that Taj Mahal is not a sign of love but of Lord Shiva built by the ancestors of Maharaj Mansingh. The temple was "Tejo Mahalaya"….!

After examining the discovery of the Taj Mahal from his point of view, Stephen Knapp has drawn the following conclusions. http://www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm

The BBC has presented the following evidence in its search http://missionisi.wordpress.com/2007/11/24/taj-mahal-or-tejo-mahalaya-2/

Historian Purushottam Nagesh Oak has proved through a complete book that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu building. So we don't need to prove it.