Vedic Rishi Gana
After proving that the theory of Aryan invasion was merely an imperialist conspiracy, today we will consider the question whether the Aryans, the ancestors of us Indians, were really rude, barbaric, nomadic, violent, looters and invaders? Today we will expose another lie of the cunning Nehruvian Left historians.
were asuras, danavs, daityas, rakshasas poor people?
Have you ever read or heard that the gods attacked the demon world and took control over it? However, you read and hear everywhere that the Asuras/Demons invaded and occupied the Devas and the gods used to roam here and there because of their fear. Rakshasas like Ravana (the founder of the Rakshasa culture) used to hold the gods captive and stand in his court. Secondly, the Devas and the Asuras/Demons/Rakshasas were so powerful that they did not understand humans (the descendants of Maharaja Manu, the great-grandson of Brahma, who ruled in the south of the Himalayas, were called Manav). Since Asuras/Demons used to oppress human beings, so humans used to get the support/help of Dev castes against them. The Devas probably helped them against them in exchange for sacrifices (offerings/fees).
Thirdly, all the three castes of Sur (God), Asura/Demon and Manav were of the same origin. The Sur, the Asuras and the demons were the children of different wives (daughters of Prajapati) of the sage Brahma's grandson Kashyap, while Manav was the son of Maharaja Manu, the great-grandson of Brahma. Therefore, the fourth thing, the Dev-Asura struggle was a family fight for power, there was no caste conflict. So as today's leftist historians and Ambedkarite neo-Buddhists try to explain that the Aryans (the gods and the human races) were the invaders of the Asuras and the Danavas (the so-called natives) and that this caste conflict was a white lie. The interesting thing is that these leftist historians first declare the Aryans as violent, invaders and victors and in the second moment they are ruthless, barbaric wandering in the conquered areas and in search of cattle pasture and pasture except weapons. And tell the nomads. Why would a conqueror leave the conquered area and become a nomad?
The absurdity of leftist historians
If the leftist historians are to be believed, then the looters, rude and invading Aryans crossed the Hindukush and attacked the city civilization of the Indus Valley and then left the city, keeping their weapons, some went to graze sheep and cows on the mountains and some started farming in the village. Because they had already proved that Aryans were uncivilized, nomadic, tribal, then they could not live in the city. That's why they came, attacked, captured the city and then some went to graze sheep and some to do farming. Do you get anywhere with this thing? Did Ghori, Babur, Hun etc. invaded the cities of Delhi/Agra and started farming? Will an invader lay down weapons and farm and raise cattle in the village and on the mountains? Shanti will shout peace, will perform yajna? Then what will the rest of the village people leave him alive? But who should explain the innate roots to these leftist historians?
What is even more interesting is that the communist historians and Ambedkarite neo-Buddhists today have declared these powerful Asuras, Demons and Rakshasas, from whom gods and humans were always in fear, as Dalit, oppressed, oppressed ethnic groups and by them the real victims ( Dev and human races or Aryans) as invaders, which is really just a display of their mental bankruptcy or ignorance from India's glorious civilization, culture and Sanatan Dharma and is completely untrue.
Who were the non-Aryan people?
All the people who believed in Vedic culture, civilization, religion, rites were called Aryas (superior) whether they lived in Bharatvarsha, Arbasthan, Africa or Europe and those who did not believe were called Anaryas. Aryans and struggle in today's context can be explained in these words:India, a country of peace-loving Aryans, is constantly suffering from non-Aryan terrorists, internal and external. Terrorists infiltrate into India and attack continuously, damage the lives and property of the people of India, due to which we Indians are always afraid, any of our festivals passes in the shadow of terror. Similarly, we Indians are constantly troubled by non-Aryan Naxalites and criminals. India fights it fiercely. Sometimes there is also a face-to-face war and India gives a befitting reply to their nefarious antics, defeats them. If needed, also does surgical strikes etc.
Now the country of Aryans fighting for self-defense, non-Aryan terrorists, Naxalites and criminals are defeated every time from India, so only because of this reason we cannot call India as violent and aggressive and non-Aryan terrorists, Naxalites as indigenous people. But the leftist historians have been telling us this till now. The Left had also propagated China's invasion of India as India's invasion of China.
Who were the enemies of the Vedic people?
The study of Vedas is necessary to crack the anti-Hindu/anti-India conspiracy of leftist historians. Let us prove the above things with the details given in the Vedas.
First, let us talk about the enemies of the Vedic people, who were they because the Vedic people have been proved to be attackers on them. The enemies of the Vedic people can be divided into four parts:
1. Antisocial elements- Tama, Tamovridh, Mayavin, Smugglers, Dasyus, Sly, Du:shans etc.
2. Yayavar clan - Vyathi, Akarma, Mridhravacha, Vrik, Adham, Vampire, Kravyad, Rakshasa, Yatudhan etc.
3. Common Enemies- Amitra, Ari, Arati, Shatru, Sprudha etc.
4. Those having ideological differences- Vaghrivach, Mridhravacha, Ayajyu, Anindra, Akarma, Anas, Anyavrata, Dwisha, Pani etc.
Now, if we analyze the enemies of the above Vedic people, then it will be found that most of them are enemies within the society and not outside and there is no question of the Vedic people being external to these enemies. As such, most of these words are derogatory which are used against people having social and ideological differences within the people of their society. Asura, Vritra etc. have been used against people who block or encircle the road (trade route). The nuisances of bandits and wild tribes are predominant in the external elements. Probably these wild people not only harm agriculture and livestock from time to time, but they themselves (Aryans) also tortured them by finding them alone or unsafe. That's why they curse these enemies, convince them that they should be bad.
“O Lord Soma, who rob me of even my good psyche, who corrupts a gentleman like me, let him be bitten by a snake (7.104.2). Thieves and sneaky enemies who contaminate our food and water, torture horses and cows, may they perish, O Agni, may their entire family perish (7.104.10).
Vedic conflict is protective in nature and not aggressive
If you read the Vedas, you will come to know that the nature of Vedic struggle is protective and not aggressive. In fact, it was a less violent and more tolerant civilization according to its era and environment. War was his compulsion, a measure of self-defense. Therefore, the mention of bravery and war is more intense than that of their sacrifices for defense, which the leftist historians did not pay attention to or deliberately left out because by paying attention to them the Vedic people could not be accused of violent, looters and invaders. This call of trahi maam, trahi maam against atrocities and oppressions by Asuras/demons resonates from Vedic period to later literature. He reminds them of the valor of all the gods and demands their protection.
Martya Aghayu (enemies) whether they are near or far, protect them, save our lives, (1.27.3) Agni, protect us from cunning predators. (1.36.15) Protect us from those who are angry with us who want to kill us. O Yagya Yup, burn these cannibalistic demons, save us from these sinners. (1.36.14) May Agni protect us with your indomitable defenses. (1.95.9) Varun, save us from the thieves and thieves who kill us. (2.28.10) May we never come in contact with these rebellious predators. (2.35.6) Agni, pleased with our sacrifice, kill these ever-increasing demons, and save us. (2.23.14) Brihaspati Do not hand over to my devotee somewhere in the hands of these thieves, assailants, traitors, deities who keep an eye on the wealth of others. (2.23.16) Indra, let us not be afraid of those who rely on your credibility, O undefeated Jeeta, we salute you. (2.28.10) May Indra remove our fear. (2.40.10) Look at us, O God of Yajna, may our fear be removed by your protection. Gods, save us from dastardly predators, protect us from these evildoers.
This annoyance and compulsion often take the form of bullshit. The living members of the enemies and even the unborn child die. He who persecutes us should go to hell (4.4.5, 6.44.17). Fire, I throw thieves and smugglers into your mouth, chew them and eat them, devour these thieves by scratching their mouths (1.79.11). Here the position of these enemies is also clear, they are foresters or wild and people who attack or plunder fodder by hiding in chambers or river basins (27.11.77-79).
Such frightened people, whose helplessness and timidity are echoed in the whole of the Vedas, can they be invaders? In fact, the Vedic struggle is the story of a relentless struggle of prosperous people with a relatively high level of civilization and productivity against barbarians, plunderers, violent, nomadic tribes, ruthless thieves, dacoits, guilds, those who stole money and cattle and fled. Anti-Hindu, cunning leftist historians have conspiratorially given the neighborhood in the form of the story of the invasion of Aryans (superior) against the above violent, looters and barbarians.
Like today the relatively prosperous and developed Hindu society keeps pleading with the government to protect itself from terrorists, naxalites, criminals. Concerned for their safety, living in the requisite prosperity and splendour, the wish of these people is peace and order, not war. The same wish of “Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah Sarve Santu Niramaya, Sarve Bhadrani Pashyantu Ma Kashchit Dukhbhag Bhavet” resonates in India and in Hindu society from Vedic times till today in poetry, invocations, after recitations of worship, in peace texts. Such ardent desire for peace has not been found anywhere else in the then world. This Shantipath is the same ancient Rigvedic passage, on the basis of which the Vedic people are cunningly proved to be uncivilized, barbaric, invaders.
peace of peace in the Vedas
Indra and Pusha are peacekeepers for food benefits, Wealth and grains are safe, rain is pleasant, there is no excessive rain or rain, the owners of the field should be at ease, the harvest is good, the wind is beneficial, the storm does not come, the earth and the sky are peaceful. May there be no bad weather and no earthquake etc. May the chemist and disease-carrying god Rudra be peaceful, disease epidemics do not come, people associated with production and those who live on charity, live in peace, artists and craftsmen live in peace, rivers beneficent. There should be no flood, the sea should be welfare, there should not be storms etc. during sea voyages etc. Can the imagination and desire be of any rude, barbaric, backward people associated with the economy?
In Atharvaveda, Indra is called Vanik. In the Rigveda also Indra has been repeatedly called Madhava i.e. Maha Dhani. The biggest thing is that the origin of Vaishya Varna is believed to be from Rigveda. These merchants were the patrons of the creators of Rigveda. Many hymns of the Rigveda are related to obstacles in the way of trade commerce and requests for protection of persons and most of the enemies of the Vedic people appear to be the enemies of the trade commerce of the Aryans. It is possible that many hymns were composed keeping in mind the sacrifices performed by the Vaniks. It is also possible that the word Arya was then used in the same sense as the word Shresthi in the later Vedic period and today the word Mahajan is used, which has become a sign of respect in the course of time.
There is no caste conflict in Vedas
In fact the enemies of the Vedic people were the same as our enemies in today's context:
1. Commercial Enemies- Thieves, Robbers, Robbers, Kidnappers, Smugglers etc.
2. Social Enemies - Criminals, Terrorists, Naxalites etc.
3. Ideological enemies like patriots, nationalists and anti-Hindu jihadis, missionaries, anti-nationals, leftists, urban naxals, pseudo-seculars etc.
4. Geo-Physical Enemy - Country of Asuras With reference to Pakistan, India is the country of gods
Just as the above is not a caste conflict, similarly the Vedic struggle was not a caste struggle. The ancestors of all of us were great Vedic Aryans. The Vedic civilization was the world's greatest civilizational culture and the Vedic people were the original inhabitants of India and our great ancestors (read our article - The theory of Aryan invasion was a British imperialist conspiracy). Truth, non-violence, love, fraternity, peace and universal brotherhood were his blessings. But he strictly followed the policy of non-violence paramodharma with dharma violence and thatvacha which was necessary for the protection of truth, justice, dharma and own existence.