The theory of Aryan invasion was an imperialist conspiracy of British rule in India. The "Aryan race" was invented in the 1850s by a French, Joseph Arthur Day, which was adopted in India by the British soldier Cunningham, who was the first head of the Archaeological Department of India. Before that there is no mention of Aryan race anywhere in the history, Puranas and Vedas of India because there was no such thing as Aryan "caste". The word Arya was not actually a caste indicator, "superiority" was an indicator of "respect" and the people of India used the word Arya to give respect. The wives of Indians used to address their husbands as Aryans to pay respect to their husbands. Whether you read Ramayana, Mahabharata, Kalidas, Varahamihira, Shudrak, Chanakya or anyone, this is true. The Aryan "caste" was the product of the crooked mind of the British.
What was the motive behind declaring Aryans as invaders
In fact, the natives of Bharatvarsha, Aryavarta, Brahmadesh, Saptsaindhav, who lived in the Makran coast bordering Iran and Balochistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Jammu and Kashmir, Tibet, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan and North Gujarat, were devastated by the British. There was a double trick by declaring the Aryan caste. On the one hand, he succeeded in weakening the united India by dividing it into Aryan and Dravidian castes, and on the other hand, he emphasized the principle that the people living in this Devbhoomi Bharatvarsha are foreigners like them, not connected to this soil; So that people can be confused that just as the invading Aryans and the invading Muslims can rule India, in the same way the British have the ability to become the legitimate rulers of India. And keeping this in mind, he fabricated all the imaginary evidence and story, which the Nehruvian Left historians and leftist intellectuals, who were parasitic mentality, accepted as supernatural knowledge and have been teaching us the same ill-fated lessons.
In fact, after the revolt of 1857, the British government realized that if the British rule in India is to be maintained, then three principles will have to be adopted - 1. English power over India will have to be proved valid, 2. The policy of divide and rule has to be adopted and 3. Supporter of British rule has to be created. Cunningham's invention of the Aryan race and institutionalizing the theory of Aryan invasion was an attempt to legitimize the British rule over India by showing that the people of India are not actually of Indian origin but they themselves invaded their own country India. Is. When he invented the invader, then it was also necessary to attack to give it a historical look. At that time there was neither Ambedkar, nor the so-called indigenous Dalits nor the upper castes; All were Hindus. That is why he declared the Hindus of South India as the original inhabitants of India and a separate Dravidian race from the Aryans and declared the North Indians as Aryans and declared them as invaders on the South Indians i.e. Dravidians. Two victims were killed with one arrow from this scourge. One, by declaring Hindus as invaders on their own country India, the attempt to legitimize British power in India was strengthened, secondly, after a successful attempt to divide Hindus and Muslims, under the policy of divide and rule, there was an attempt to divide Hindus also. And it was a very successful effort because he divided India into two races- Aryan and Dravidian and fought the North and South Indian Hindus.
The British Viceroy had started the work of fulfilling his third objective long ago. Macaulay, a fanatical Protestant Christian who believed that the solution to the crisis of the British Raj in India lay in the conversion of Indians to Christians either permanently or mentally, was appointed as an academician of India. In 1836 it wrote to his father "Our English schools are flourishing wonderfully. The effect of this education on the Hindus is prodigious… It is my belief that if our plans of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes in Bengal thirty years hence. And this will be effected without any efforts to proselytise, without the smallest interference with religious liberty, by natural operation of knowledge and reflection. I heartily rejoice in the project.”
Journalist and historian Stephen Knapp, highlighting the objectives of Macaulay's education policy, wrote, "The purpose was to turn the strength of Hindu intellectuals against their own kind by utilizing their commitment to scholarship in uprooting their own tradition, which Macaulay viewed as nothing more than superstitions. His plan was to educate the Hindus to become Christians and turn them into collaborators.”
For the fulfillment of his goal, he needed a person who could fulfill his objectives and his search ended on the German-British Max Müller and he employed him. He diligently engaged in the fulfillment of this objective. How dangerous his goal was is shown in a letter he wrote to his wife in 1866. He writes, "It [the Rig Veda] is the root of their religion and to show them what the root is, I feel sure, is the only way of uprooting all that has sprung from it during the last three thousand years."
MaxMuller admitted his lie by dying
Unfortunately, in India, students and scholars of Sanskrit are still being taught the dangerous interpretation of Max Muller. Max Müller gave a magic figure to institutionalize the British conspiracy to invade the Aryans that the Rigveda was composed around 1200 BCE, however, his quirks came under heavy criticism later, after which he himself denied. He wrote, "If now we ask how we can fix the dates of these periods, it is quite clear that we cannot hope to fix a terminum a qua. Whether the Vedic hymns were composed [in] 1000 or 1500 or 2000 or 3000 BC, no power on earth will ever determine.” (B. B. Lal, Origin of Indian Civilization, Edited by Bal Ram Singh, Center for Indic Studies, Dartmouth, USA, 2010. p. 23-24).
In 1888 he categorically admitted, “I have declared again and again that if I say Aryan, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor skull nor hair; I mean simply those who speak the Aryan language… To me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan blood, Aryan race, Aryan eyes and hair is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or of brachycephalic grammar.” (Max Muller, Biography of Words and the Home of the Aryas, by London, 1888, p. 120).
It is clear from the above things that the Aryans who had propagated the false theory of being a caste and their invasion, they eventually denied it, but unfortunately even today the students of history are still exposed to the same propaganda and conspiracy in the name of the history of India. I am being taught that I myself am a victim. As a child, after reading the book "Discovery of India" full of lies and deceit of Jawaharlal Nehru, I had become so self-loathing and inferiority complex that after reading Swami Vidyanand's book "Aryan Ka Adi Desh Bharat" when I realized that we and our forefathers were our ancestors. He was not an invader on the country, but was the heritage of this soil for centuries, so it seemed as if the burden of lakhs of tons was lightened from his head. For the fulfillment of their vested interests, the British declared India's glorious history and history man by crookedly as mythology (fictional) and declared that we are the descendants of foreign Aryan race and we are invaders on our own motherland and we were only 1500 BC before That is, from today only 3520 years ago they came to India. do you believe? Oh, thousands of years before that, we have physical evidence available, written evidence describes the events of thousands and millions of years ago, which is related to the particle particle of this land.
Indus Valley Civilization
Another conspiracy they did is that they conspired to declare the Indus Valley Civilization as separate and east of the Vedic civilization because it was considered a part of the Vedic civilization 'which it actually was', so their conspiracy to declare the Aryans as foreigners and invaders. would not be completed. If you study closely the religious, social, settlement, city building, dress, jewellery, symbols etc. of the Indus civilization, then you will come to know that they have been an integral part of Vedic and Hindu civilization and even today most of them are used as they are. Happening. Our leftist historians consider it to be the result of the transition from the Indus civilization but remain silent on why the so-called invading Aryans more or less completely absorbed the invaded Indus civilization while the Aryans considered themselves superior? Then why the religion of non-Aryans and invaders, God, civilization, rites, arts, crafts, science etc. have all been adopted? Did the British invaders adopt Hindu civilization, culture and religion or did the Muslim invaders become Hindu and Hindustani by invading India? If this was the case, then why would Pakistan have been formed after partitioning India?
The reality is that the Indus civilization was an integral part of the Vedic civilization itself. Similarly, what is said to be the arrival of the Aryans in India, it was actually the incident of moving towards the east for their new shelter due to the submergence of most of the cities situated on the banks of the river Indus due to the diversion of the Indus river. By the time of the Vedic period, it had spread to Bengal in the east and Narmada and Andhra Pradesh in the south. The description of the departure in the Vedas in the past is the story of the expansion of civilization and its time could not be determined because the time determination of the Vedas itself has not been possible.
Archaeologist B B Lal's opinion
The eminent archaeologist B. B. Lal describes how the Aryan invasion theory was formed, “Since the Vedic civilization was declared by Max Muller to be 1200 AD before the magic figure, when the Harappan civilization was discovered in 1920 A.D. And its date was fixed before 3000 AD, then he declared it non-Vedic and since the largest language group after Aryan language was Dravidian, he assumed that the people of Harappan civilization were Dravidian. Then in 1946 Wheeler discovered a fort at Harappa and since Indra is called Purandara (destroyer of the fort) in the Vedas, he declared without wasting time that the Harappan civilization was destroyed by the Aryan invasion and from Mohenjodeo. Some of the skulls found were declared as murders by the Aryans, while the skulls found there were multi-layered, that is, of different periods. The American archaeologist Dales has criticized Wheeler's "theory of violence" as a theory of "imaginary violence". He further writes that it has become clear from the detailed study that no evidence of any war, invasion or migration has been found in 4500-800 AD, so not only the theory of Aryan invasion but also the theory of migration of the modified Aryans. is wrong.
Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar's opinion on Aryans
Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar has written that most of the Shudra castes are the children of Kshatriyas. Ambedkar viewed Shudras as originally being "part of the Kshatriya Varna in the Indo-Aryan society", but became socially degraded after they inflicted many tyrannies on Brahmins.
Babasaheb Ambedkar considered Shudras as Aryans and Aryans as the original inhabitants of India and was opposed to the theory of Aryan invasion. Ambedkar viewed the Shudras as Aryan and adamantly rejected the Aryan invasion theory, describing it as "so absurd that it ought to have been dead long ago" in his 1946 book Who Were the Shudras? (Bryant, Edwin (2001). The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture, Oxford:Oxford University Press. pp. 50–51. ISBN 9780195169478)
Were the Shakas, Kushanas and Pahlava foreign invaders?
Similarly, it is conspiratorially said that the Sakas, Kushanas and Pahlavas were foreign invaders and they ruled over India, but these English and leftist historians are unable to tell that what was their religion, civilization, culture, language and origin of these foreigners. . And whatever they say, it proves that their civilization, culture, religion, language and origin were mostly Indian, if not wholly. But only because the name is non-Indian, they label them as non-Indian and foreign, so that we can deceive the Indians that India has an ancient and endless history of external invasions and external rulers so that they can control their imperial power. justified and may prove our luck.
The reality was that all of them were the descendants of Indians who were ruling in different regions as representatives of the Mauryas with the distant expansion of the Maurya Empire and after a gap of two and a half hundred years their names and languages were localized. The effect was starting to show. As long as the power of Magadha remained strong, they continued to rule firmly in the Magadha administered and conquered areas, but in the reign of Ashoka, instead of the political efficiency of commensurate punishment and distinction, the crisis came from the politics of perverted non-violence and as a result after the fall of the Maurya Empire. The central power that those administrators were getting, due to which they were ruling over remote areas, the central vacuum created by the loss of central power caused a local attack on their power and they naturally ran towards their origin and center i.e. India . But since the central power was over, their conflict with the frontier independent feudal power was natural and also happened in which they were victorious. Since his origin was in India, the people of India soon absorbed him and he India.