History of Asia

The Vedic Aryans did not come to India from outside but went to different regions outside India!

Look at this picture carefully. The Out of Africa principle is actually the Out of India principle. The whole world is now beginning to believe that the ancient civilization of the world actually spread from India to the whole world. But the unfortunate thing is that the Congress government of India and the leftist historians maintain the exact opposite theory to the truth in India. When the government and education system of India are covered with a cloak of lies, then what should other countries do? Therefore, the scholars of history from all over the world look towards the out of Africa theory which is not true.

From modern historical discoveries, archaeological evidence, ethnographic research and geographical analysis, it has become clear that Arya was not a caste group but Arya was a prestige term. There had never been any large-scale migration from abroad to India and the myth of the Aryan invasion of India was merely a British imperialist conspiracy, whereas the reality is that India was the homeland of the Vedic people and the Harappan civilization was actually a Vedic civilization. Was part of it. The original area of ​​the Vedic people stretched from present-day Afghanistan, Balochistan, Pakistan to Kashmir in the north in India and from Bengal in the east to the Narmada in the south. Read-https://truehistoryofindia.in/aryan-invation-theory-was-british-conspiracy/

Similarly, it has also become clear from the analysis of the hymns of Rigveda that the Aryans were not invaders but themselves attacked. The Vedic struggle is not a caste conflict, but a story of a continuous struggle of a prosperous and prosperous Vedic people, within the civilization itself, against barbarians, plunderers, violent, nomadic tribes, ruthless thieves, dacoits, guilds, cattle-stealers Which anti-Hindu, cunning leftist historians have conspiratorially given the neighborhood as the story of the attack of the Aryan (superior) people against the above violent, looter and barbaric people, while the plea for protection from the above people, the echo of compulsion and ruthlessness is fulfilled. heard in the Vedas. Read- https://truehistoryofindia.in/aryans-were-invaders-or-victims/

After India has been proved to be the original country of Aryans, today we will prove by quoting the researches of indigenous foreign historians that the evidence on the basis of which there was a conspiracy to prove the Vedic people to be foreigners, in fact the same evidences prove this by screaming. That the Vedic people who were in those areas had actually gone from India. Indigenous and foreign historians and researchers reach the same conclusion, except for the cunning British and Nehruvian, leftist historians of India.

Indus Valley Civilization Was Vedic Civilization

Historian Bhagwan Singh, in his book Harappan Civilization and Vedic Literature, has put in detail the fact that the Vedic people were the original inhabitants of India, the Harappan civilization was basically the Vedic civilization itself. The Vedic civilization was the most developed, progressive and reached the highest level of trade and productivity in the world. The trade of Vedic people was done till the whole of Asia and Europe. The Vedic people had commercial establishments throughout Eurasia. Along with the Vedic traders, the Vedic missionaries also traveled to different regions and spread the Vedic civilization culture and religion in the same way as the Buddhists at the time of Ashoka and Christian missionaries in modern times have done and are doing. Now let's move on to other research, discoveries and evidence:

Parsis of Iran were Indian Vedic people

Max Müller, while giving his views on Avesta and Vedic language, said that Iranian language spread from India in Iran. He writes, “I still believe that Zend (Avesta) is a synonym for the Sanskrit word verse, which Panini used for the Vedic language. If considered from the Vedic point of view, the many gods of Zoroaster appear to be mere shadows and distortions of the primitive and authentic gods of the Vedas. Now it can also be proved on the basis of geographical evidence that the Zoroastrians were settled in India before coming to Persia. The Zoroastrians and their ancestors left India during the Vedic period, it can be proved as bluntly as the Messinaians left from Greece." (V M Apte, Vedic Rituals)

It is the same Max Muller who initially supported the theory of Aryan invasion and fixed the period of Rigveda only before 1000 AD, but before his death he accepted it as his mistake. Although the sly Indian leftist historians, taking no lesson from their mistake, engaged in propaganda due to anti-Hindu mentality.

Mr. Mills, in his role of the translation of the third volume of the Avesta, after considering the comparative timing of the Rigveda and the Avesta from various angles, refutes the belief that the saga is older than the ancient portions of the Rigveda. In his opinion, “the tales are much later than the earlier passages of the Rigveda. He said that Hogg's claim that the old gods were abruptly and intentionally rejected in the legends, nor that the Indians were migrated south due to religious differences. This process was certainly the exact opposite. (Mill L.H., The Zend Avesta (Pt. III) SBES, XXXI, Delhi).

That is, he considered the Avesta to be later than the old hymns of the Rigveda, which meant that the Avesta was written by the Vedic people displaced from India in imitation of the Rigveda or say the Vedic people.

In fact, Giridhar Sharma Chaturvedi presents this story about the religious differences between the Indian and Iranian branches, which have been said to be the cause of migration till date, “Starting from the 86th hymn of the tenth mandala of the Rigveda, there is a verse in the subsequent hymns. signal is received. There was a person named Zarathustra, the brother-in-law of Rijrasva Rishi, his heart naturally had hatred towards the brahmins of that period. Zarathustra, coming from the tradition, rejected Indra's preference and established Varuna in his place. Its indication is found in the Nedra Devammansat Mantra of the Rikasamhita. Among the sages present, Nirimedha, Vamadeva, Gargya etc. took the side of Indra and Suparna, Kanva, Bharadwaj etc. took the side of Varuna and Vashishtha etc. respected both of them in their respective places. Therefore, the supporters of Varuna left from India to Iran under the leadership of Zarathustra. (Girdhar Sharma Chaturvedi, Vedic Science and Indian Culture, Patna and Indian Civilization in the Rigvedas, Yeotmal by P R Deshmukh)

Jatindra Mohan Chatterjee believes that the Avesta is the creation of Bhrigu and that Bhrigu was a worshiper of Varuna. The distinction that is talked about is embodied in the mythological episode in which Bhrigu is shown kicking Vishnu on the chest. The regular belief in the Avesta as Agnya or Avadhya and the mention of the purity of Gomez or cow urine again confirms this belief in the post-deification of cow in India. (Atharva Zarathustra saga, JM Chatterjee) Only in the old hymns of the Rigveda, the slaughter of dogs has been prohibited. In the Avesta, the slaughter of a dog is considered a grave sin – more grievous than the slaughter of a cow, more grievous than the slaughter of a human. According to the Iranian penal code, if forty whips were applied for killing a human, then a hundred whips for killing a dog.

Vedic culture of the Baltic region

The Baltic regions of Lithuania and Latvia are considered to be the original Indo-European settlements. According to Dr. Suniti Kumar Chaturjya, there is a deep similarity of the language of this region with the Vedic language and like the Vedic hymns, some mantras (Dayana) have been recited here and some rituals like Dhup Angiari have also been prevalent here. She further writes, “In the nineteenth century, when the Baltic people of Latvia and Lithuania began to study their national literature Dayana, they became conscious of their Indian succession. Latvian writer Fr. Malbagris wrote in 1856 that Latvians had come from the banks of the Ganges like the Russians and Germans. According to Latvian tradition, the pottyaks came from India carrying knowledge and science. The teacher of this deep learning was the Widewoods. Ancient Lithuanian priests used to burn sacred fires to follow their ancient Indo-European customs, and as suggested by a modern Lithuanian poet, the ritual came to Lithuania from the Indus coast." ( Balts and Aryans in their Indo-European Background, Simla; Matsya Purana, Rampratap Tripathi, Manav Grihasutra, Ramakrishna Harshji)

Getting there with an in-depth knowledge of the Widewoods and then getting the mark of their own language and culture throughout the region can give some idea of ​​what the local knowledge science and culture might have been like. This is also confirmed in the Iranian tradition. (Harappan Civilization and Vedic Literature, Lord Singh)

Vedic people of Greece

The people who are credited with the creation of this civilization were Indian linguists. There is a lot of confusion about when and how they reached Greece and how they got themselves to that summit, but the language of Greece does not bear as much resemblance to the European languages ​​of its immediate neighbourhood, as it appears with Sanskrit. Performs - Bhagwan Singh

Burrow writes, "Greek does not show signs of close contact with any other language of the Kantum class, on the contrary it is closely related to Indo-Iranian and Armenian. This is especially found in the form of verbs. Originally the Aryan-speaking people could reach this island only from the east. (The Sanskrit Language, London. T Barrow) Dr. Suniti Kumar Chaturjya writes, “Very reliable representations of the clothes of the Iranian Aryans are found in the remains of Hakhamani sculptures and tapestries dating back to the 6th century BCE. The Parsi Aryans had made a habit of wearing kule clothes like the Indian Aryans, this can be seen in the ancient sculptures. The Greeks chose plain unstitched cloth, which is also found in the two textile divisions of the Indo-Aryans, the Dhautras and the Uttara." ( Balts and Aryans in their Indo-European Background, Simla; Wonder that is India)

Vedic Civilization of Asia Minor

The Hittite inscriptions from Bogjakui in Asia Minor contain the names of Vedic gods, which are similar only to India. Similarly, the numbers used in a book of horse rearing are also related to India only. Hittite bears the most resemblance to Vedic Sanskrit, so it has been hypothesized that the original Indo-European language was divided into two branches, one being the Indian Hittite branch and the other being the rest of the Indo-European languages. (B K Chatopadhayay, Mohenjodaro and Aryan Colonization of Mesopotamia)

At the tip of northern Mesopotamia, a seal of the intention of the Harappan Kakudya Vrisham is also found from Barak in the Mitanni region. Mitanni whose language was Aryan language, looking at this seal appears to be a Harappan merchant. On this, Sartaj DD Kaushambi of leftist historians suggests that "Aryans who arrived in Asia Minor belonged to the branch which had invaded India and which either because of being defeated here or because of not liking the climate etc. returned to." If it is believed that the Aryans who remained here did not know how to make seals, but those who ran away learned to mold, those who remained here neither came to make seals nor did they get acquainted with the script of seals. The historical thinking of Marxist historian DD Kaushambi, the guru of leftist historians, is full of such anti-India mentality, which we have discussed many times before.

As a matter of fact, all the scholars are unanimous about the Hittite influence area that there was a small number of Aryan language-speaking people and their language was completely different from the language of the common people. The result of this small number was that the Aryan-language had such a negligible effect on the language of this region that if the fortification inscriptions had not been saved, then one could not even guess that there was ever any such language here. It was used by the class – Bhagwan Singh, in such a situation, talking about the invasion of Aryavarta by the few Aryan speaking people here by calling it the native area of ​​the Aryans, what else could be foolish. But Krishna Ghosh writes, “Although the Hittites had gained authority in Asia Minor, it was not the original abode of the Hittites. Before the Hittite Empire, it was under Assyria, which gradually died out by 1950 AD. It is evident that this happened due to the Aryan-speaking Hittite invasion, whose above written record is kept around 1400 AD.

Vedic people in Tigris Euphrates

Writing its history on the basis of ancient Babylonian traditions, Beros (3rd century BC) wrote that a group of demons reached the Persian Gulf by sea from the east. Its leader was Oenes (Indian Usnus?). The Sumerians' gratitude to these people, who brought with them advanced technology, can be seen in the acknowledgment that it was these wonderful people who spread metallurgy, agriculture and writing, and started everything that led to an advanced life. It is necessary, and from that time till today no new invention has been made. (The Sumerian Oxford, Woolley C Leonard)

Ray Heros also tried to prove on the basis of descriptions in Berossus and the Bible that the civilization in Sumer was spread by the builders of the Harappan civilization. He stuck to his beliefs till the end. Some others have attributed this inspiration to the Baluchi cultures, especially the people of Kulli, whose Ghia stone cans are found from the beginning in Sumeria and Mesopotamia. (Proto Indian origin of the Sumerian civilisation, Saradar Panikkar Sastyabda, Structure and Fundction in Primitive Society, London)

Sags writes, “There was no local population in Sumer. इसबात के अकाट्य पुरातात्विक साक्ष्य है की एरिदु काल, जिसे ४५०० इसवी पूर्व या इससे कुछ बाद में रखा गया है से पहले बेबिलोनिया में मानव संस्कृति का कोई अवशेष नहीं मिलता. (Thed Greatness that is Babylon, London)

सुमेरी देवताओं के नाम यद्यपि सुमेरी भाषा से मिलते हैं, पर ये प्रधान वैदिक देवताओं के प्रतिरूप हैं, यथा, सूर्य-शम्स, मरुतस-मरुत इंद्रा-म्रदुक, वरुण-रम्मन, सोम या चन्द्र-सिन, वृत्र–तैमत आदि. सुमेरी जनों की, विशेषतः महिलाओं की वेश-भूषा और केश विन्यास की शैली पर भृत्य प्रभाव देखा गया है जो आँखों में काजल, होठों पर लाली, वालों में तेल और शरीर पर उबटन लगाती थी. बेबीलोन में अश्वमेघ का प्रचलन इस बात का प्रमाण है की मिश्र से लेकर एलाम तक के क्षेत्र में ये आर्य व्यापारी कितने प्रभावशाली बने हुए थे और उनकी सामाजिक प्रतिष्ठा क्या थी (बेबीलोन एंड इंडिया, कुप्पुस्वामी शास्त्री). मिश्र के ३००० ईस्वी पूर्व के सबसे प्राचीन प्रसिद्द शासकों में रामसेसे में राम शब्द बहुत ही मायने रखता है.

मध्य एशिया में वैदिक सभ्यता

मैक्समुलर ने इसी क्षेत्र में मूल भारोपीय जनों को बसा माना था जहाँ से अपने छोटे भाइयों को पश्चिम उत्तर की ओर विदा करने के बाद बड़े भाई ने दक्षिण की राह पकड़ी थी और भारत में उतर आये थे. इसी क्षेत्र के पश्चिमी भाग के लिए मीदिया शब्द का प्रयोग होता रहा है. जरथुष्ट्र और उनके समर्थक इसी क्षेत्र के थे. मीदिया अथवा मंद सम्भवतः पौराणिक काल का मद्र राज्य है जहाँ की राजकुमारी माद्री महाभारत के पांडवों की माता थी. मद्र नरेश शाल्व की वीरता से भी सभी परिचित होंगे.

ग्रियसन लिखते हैं, “जो लोग अन्य बातों में मतभेद रखते हैं वे यह मानते हैं की मंद आर्य थे. मूलतः वे जहाँ कहीं से भी आये रहे हों, हमें इस बात का स्पष्ट संकेत नहीं मिलता की वे दक्षिण या दक्षिण पूर्व से या जैसा की कुछ लेखक सोचते हैं, भारत से आये थे, परन्तु उनके देवता वे ही थे जिनके नाम भारत में पाते हैं और यह की वे सतेम भाषी थे, जो प्राचीन संस्कृत से अधिक निकटता रखती है. (Linguistic Survey of India, Vol-I, Delhi)

इन क्षेत्रों में हडप्पा से मिलती जुलती संस्कृति, वस्तुएं और मोहरें प्राप्त होती है. इनका प्रसार केंद्र सोवियत विद्वानों ने भी भारत को माना है (The Urban Revolution in South Turkmenia, Antiquity)

इस लेख में जो दिए गए हैं वे मूलतः इतिहासकार भगवान सिंह के हडप्पा सभ्यता और वैदिक साहित्य से लिए गए हैं. इसके अतिरिक्त महाभारत युद्ध पश्चात जब द्वारिका नष्ट हो गया तब यदुवंशी २२ जत्थों में विश्व के विभिन्न हिस्सों में जा बसे थे. उनमें से कुछ एशिया से यूरोप तक बस गये थे. उन्हीं यदुवंशी जत्थों में से एक जत्था आज यहूदी कहलाता है (आगे नवीन शोध में पढ़ें-यहूदी वास्तव में यदुवंशी हैं) . इतनाही नहीं विदेशी इतिहासकारों और विद्वानों द्वारा शोधपरक ऐसे दर्जनों ग्रन्थ उपलब्ध है जिससे कम से कम पुरे एशिया, यूरोप और अफ्रीका में अनंत काल से लेकर ईसा और इस्लाम पूर्व काल तक वैदिक सभ्यता, संस्कृति, धर्म, परम्परा के प्रचलन का सबूत मिलते हैं. आगे प्रत्येक देश और प्राचीन सभ्यताओं में वैदिक संस्कृति के सबूत क्रमबद्ध प्रस्तुत किए जायेंगे.