Ancient history

Study History >> Millennium History > >> World history >> Ancient history

What is one of the revolutionary developments in Roman architecture?

One of the most significant and revolutionary developments in Roman architecture was the invention and extensive use of concrete (opus caementicium). Unlike the Greeks, who mainly used stone blocks for construction, the Romans developed a concrete mix composed of lime (calcium oxide), volcanic ash (pozzolana), sand, and aggregate. This concrete proved to be incredibly versatile, allowing the Romans to construct massive and complex structures that were both strong and durable.

Concrete enabled Roman architects to create new architectural forms, such as arches, domes, and vaults, which were not easily achievable with traditional stone masonry. These architectural advancements not only allowed the Romans to build awe-inspiring monuments, temples, amphitheaters, and aqueducts but also made their structures more resistant to earthquakes compared to buildings constructed solely with stone.

By developing and mastering concrete, the Romans transformed the landscape of architecture and engineering, and their innovations continue to influence construction practices even today.

Previous Post

What were the beliefs of fate in Elizabethan times?

Next Post

How did building castles make William the Conqueror more powerful?

Operation "Boxer":Egyptians "suffer" from Israeli aircraft
Despite Israels decisive victory in the Six Day War, Egypt continued hostilities, refusing to sit down at the negotiating table. Gradually, the Egyptian armed forces were significantly strengthened by the Soviet Union. The Egyptians, on March 8, 1969, began what became known as the War of Attriti
History of Elections
By Rainer Sousa Popularly recognized as the highest point in the exercise of democracy, elections have a much more complex trajectory than we might think. Currently, the choice of political representatives through the vote reaches only half of the people worldwide. In this way, we can understand tha
How did the Persians count their casualties in battle?
Some time ago we published an article on the size of armies throughout history, with a comparison made by the Slovakian cartographer Martin Vargic where it can be seen that, apart from the Chinese case, the number of combatants reached its peak around the year 500 BC and then it was progressively de
At the school of fire
But the superiority of the Wehrmacht was not only quantitative:it was ready for aggression. His troops were concentrated in compact groupings that had everything necessary for operations. The soldiers and officers had combat experience, they had been to the school of fire in the west and in the sout