History of South America

How did Marcus approach to civil rights differ from that of the NAACP?

Marcus Garvey's approach to civil rights differed from that of the NAACP in several key ways:

- Emphasis on black nationalism and self-reliance: Garvey believed that the best way to achieve civil rights for African Americans was through black nationalism and self-reliance. He argued that African Americans needed to build their own institutions and businesses and to develop a sense of pride in their own culture and history. The NAACP, on the other hand, focused on integrating African Americans into white society and fighting for equal rights under the law.

- Use of mass movements: Garvey used mass movements to mobilize African Americans and promote his ideas. He founded the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) in 1914, which became one of the largest black organizations in the United States. The NAACP, on the other hand, was a more elite organization that focused on legal challenges and lobbying.

- International focus: Garvey was interested in promoting black nationalism on a global scale. He believed that African Americans should unite with Africans in other parts of the world to fight for their common interests. The NAACP, on the other hand, was focused on civil rights issues in the United States.

Despite their differences, both Marcus Garvey and the NAACP played an important role in the civil rights movement. Garvey helped to raise the consciousness of African Americans and to promote a sense of pride in their own culture and history. The NAACP fought for equal rights under the law and helped to desegregate American society.