Hindu Buildings
The lie of the historical buildings of India being Muslim buildings, mosques, mausoleums etc. was deliberately spread by a greedy Englishman named Alexander Cunningham, who was unfortunately the first chairman of the Archaeological Survey of India. Even the buildings their surveyors found Hindu buildings were scolded and silenced. As surveyor Joseph Bagler declared Qutub Minar and its surrounding buildings Hindu buildings, the cunning Cunningham silenced him - PN Oak
The only pro-Muslim, anti-Hindu leftist historians started spreading that lie spread by Cunningham. When he was asked that in those buildings that Hindu symbols like conch, chakra, lotus, bell, swastika etc. and human figures, animal figures made around the pillars in Hindu buildings; Why are animals like elephants found at the entrances, which are considered haram by the Muslims, whom they hate, so they argued that the Muslims used to break Hindu buildings and build new buildings from their debris, so these signs remained. When it was proved that high quality new buildings could not be made from the demolition debris, they started saying that since the artisans who made the building were Hindu, they have a Hindu symbol.
The question is, the British have also built big churches and they have been built by Hindu artisans. Why is there no Hindu symbol in them? Even today Muslims build mosques and the builders are Hindu or Hindustani artisans, so why don't they make holy Hindu symbols in mosques? Do you think that a jihadi will get the infidels to work and if the holy symbols of the infidels speak in their buildings, then they will build mosques and tombs? The reality is quite the opposite, that in all the acquired Hindu buildings, which are today called Muslim buildings, Hindu symbols and human-animal figures have been broken, rubbed and destroyed or every effort has been made to eradicate them themselves. Explain their theft. But leftist historians still shamelessly try to describe day as night in the same way as leftist journalist Ravish Kumar was tricking people by calling rioter Shahrukh in Delhi's Islamic riots as Anuj Mishra.
Texts of Vedic Architecture
There are dozens of ancient texts of architecture and those texts are only in Sanskrit, so they are the heritage of Vedic civilization. The Sanskrit texts in which the details of Vedic architecture i.e. architecture and the entire method of city-building, basic elements etc. are found are called Agama literature. These texts are very ancient.
According to Maharishi Manasar, the author of Manasar Shilpshastra, Brahma ji trained four scholars in the disciplines of city-building and building-building. Their names are Vishwakarma, Maya, Tavastar and Manu. The most ancient Sanskrit text of Shilp Gyan is Bhrigu Shilpasamhita. Other Sanskrit texts describing the method of making forts, palaces, pillars, buildings, palaces, bridges, temples, gurukul, math etc. are Mayamat, Kashyapa, Sarasvatyam, Yukti Kalpataru, Samarangan, Sutradhar, Akash Bhairavkalp, Narada Shilpasanhita, Vishwakarma Vidyaprakash, Brihatsamhita, Shilpashastra etc.
What is Vedic Architecture
In Vedic architecture, a yogi sitting in meditation is imagined. Just as the soul resides secretly in the body, in the same way the idol is replaced in a small dark sanctum sanctorum inside the huge temple. The platform on which that building is built is considered to be its meeting place. The first floor is the abdominal place of that Vastu Purush. The second floor is the part of the chest, shoulders. The lower round part of the Kumbhaja (dome) is the throat of Vastu Purush and the head of the Kumbhaja. The lotus flower inverted on the Kumbhja symbolizes the hair and the Kalashdand on it is the symbol of the crest. Therefore, all the ancient or medieval buildings built on this craft are in India or outside India, they are all Hindu buildings and you investigate them, they will prove to be Hindu buildings only. Also remember that all the buildings having three Kumbhaja (dome) are Hindu temples like temple of Ram, Lakshmana, Sita (so called Babri structure), Radha, Krishna, temple of Balarama (temple of Mathura birthplace), Shiva, Parvati, Temple of Ganesha (so called Gyanvapi Masjid, Kashi), Temple of Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesh etc.
There was a temple of Nagardev or Ishtadev just in front of the palace built on Vedic architecture, such as the so-called Jama Masjid in front of Lalkot in Delhi (Taimurlang made it a mosque), the so-called Jami Masjid in front of Badalgarh Fort in Agra, the so-called Rajmahal of Fatehpur Sikri. In front the so-called Tomb of Salim Chishti (this was a Shiva temple for the family of Sikar Rajputs) etc. The highway that serves them is the axis of the city. Right-left lanes of this highway are made. The city surrounding them had a thick wall like it was in Delhi, Agra, Pataliputra etc.
Vedic Pillar (Minaret)
If there is a staircase from inside in the pillar (minaret), balcony on each floor, chhatra i.e. Kumbhaj (dome) on the top of the tower, then they are the signs of the light pillar of Hindu architecture. It is also called a pillar. Like Leaning Tower of Pisa, Minaret of Ghazni Nagar of Afghanistan, Vishnu Stambha or Dhruva Pillar (Qutub Minar) of Delhi, Pillars located on the four corners of Taj Mahal, Shaking Tower of Ahmedabad etc.-PN Oak
The so-called Qutub Minar and Alai Darwaza, the Alai Masjid is actually part of the Vishnu temple complex. The Alai Masjid is actually the ruins of the Vishnu temple which was destroyed by the Muslim invaders. Here there was a huge idol of Lord Vishnu sitting on the bed. Qutub Minar which is actually Vishnu Stambha or Dhruva Stambha was situated in the middle of a lake which was a symbol of Kamalnabha. Brahma ji was seated on the lotus flower above the pillar, which was destroyed by the Muslim invaders. A pool-like path was made to go from the temple to the pillar. Astronomer Varahamihira used this pillar as an observatory. The 27 temples here symbolized the 27 constellations. Even today the name of that area is Mehrauli after the name of Varahmihir.
British surveyor Joseph Begler, in his survey report, has not only declared the entire Qutub Minar complex as a Hindu building but has also proved it, but unfortunately the Government of India, the Archaeological Survey of India and the leftist historians have forcibly declared it as a Muslim. Joseph Begler's report Archaeological Survey of India; Report for the Year 1871-72 Delhi, Agra, Volume 4, by J. D. Beglar and A. C. L. Carlleyle is available in the book which you can download at the link below, although the free PDF is not complete, it is better to buy and read.
https://www.forgottenbooks.com/en/books/ArchologicalSurveyofIndiaReportfortheYear187172_10019541
This huge temple was probably built by Chandragupta Vikramaditya, because the iron pillar here is that of Chandragupta Vikramaditya, it also shows from the excavation found inscriptions. Historian PN Oak has written that similar statue and temple of Lord Vishnu was in Mecca of Arabia, Vatican of Rome and England. The idol of Lord Vishnu is still kept in the museum of Spain.
All historical buildings are made by Hindus
Historian Purushottam Nagesh Oak writes, "Invaders are never constructor, they are only destructor."
He writes that "The ancient historical buildings from India to Arabia or Europe which are said to be built by this or that Muslims belong to Hindus, even the Taj Mahal and the Red Fort. Muslims have only destroyed Hindu buildings, temples, monasteries, schools, etc. everywhere, nothing built."
Think for yourself, do you think that illiterate, goth, violent, barbaric, yuyutsu, lustful, sensual, malevolent two words like Ghulam Qutubuddin, Alauddin Khilji and Akbar who do not even know how to read and write, they can even think about architecture. ? Can any Muslim or very leftist historian tell the name of a Muslim craftsman or a book which is not a copy of Hindu texts? There is no place for music, art, literature in Islam; Aurangzeb had put a complete ban on them by calling them un-Islamic.
The reality is that Muslims spent their entire lives in violence, looting, massacre of non-Muslims, rape and usurping the state of non-Muslims or rival Muslims. Where did he have time for construction? They lived in Hindu buildings acquired by erasing Hindu symbols as much as possible. Later on, the court sycophants who were forcibly acquired by the Muslims declared them to be built by them. None of the court historians of Alauddin, Akbar or Shah Jahan have written anything about what the Leftists today call the buildings built by them because they would have spread lies. That's why the later sycophants used to call those buildings as his own and the same work is being done by leftist historians today.
A pictorial description of the temples, monasteries, schools and buildings of India which are now called mosques and Muslim buildings is available at the link below.