Non-Violent Resistance:
- Gandhi: Gandhi was a strong proponent of non-violent civil disobedience as a means of achieving political goals. His famous non-violent campaigns against British colonial rule in India played a crucial role in India's independence.
- Sharansky: Sharansky's activism was primarily focused on advocating for human rights and the freedom of Soviet Jews during the Cold War. He engaged in public protests and dissident activities, but his methods were not specifically centered around non-violent resistance.
Political Objectives:
- Gandhi: Gandhi's primary goal was to achieve independence for India and establish a self-governing nation. His efforts were directed toward gaining political freedom from colonial rule.
- Sharansky: While Sharansky also sought political change, his main objective was to secure the release of Soviet Jews who were denied the right to emigrate, as well as to promote human rights and democratic reforms within the Soviet Union.
International Recognition:
- Gandhi: Gandhi's non-violent movement gained significant international attention, making him a global symbol for peace, social justice, and civil rights. His influence extended far beyond India.
- Sharansky: Sharansky's activism also received international recognition, but it was primarily focused on raising awareness of human rights abuses within the Soviet Union and advocating for the rights of Soviet Jews.
Personal Impact:
- Gandhi: Gandhi became an iconic figure, with his teachings and philosophy continues to inspire movements and individuals around the world. He influenced leaders such as Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela.
- Sharansky: While Sharansky also made a significant impact on human rights issues and the Jewish community, his influence may be more localized to the Soviet Union and its Jewish citizens.
In summary, while both Natan Sharansky and Mohandas Gandhi were influential activists, their achievements differed in their methods (non-violent resistance vs. public protests and advocacy), political objectives (independence vs. human rights), international recognition, and personal impact on larger global movements.