One perspective is that justice was not delivered because the United States, the country that dropped the atomic bombs, was never held accountable for its actions. The United States has never apologized for the bombings, and it has never paid any compensation to the victims. Some people argue that this lack of accountability is a form of injustice.
Another perspective is that justice was delivered because the bombings brought about the end of World War II and saved millions of lives. Some people argue that the bombings were necessary to prevent further bloodshed, and that they were therefore justified.
A third perspective is that justice was not delivered because the bombings disproportionately affected civilians. The majority of the victims of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were civilians, including women, children, and the elderly. Some people argue that this indiscriminate killing of innocent people was a violation of international law and a crime against humanity.
In addition to these three main perspectives, there are many other nuances to consider when discussing whether justice was delivered to the victims of the Hiroshima bombing. For example, some people argue that the bombings were justified because they were a response to Japanese war crimes, while others argue that the bombings were a disproportionate response to these crimes.
Ultimately, the question of whether justice was delivered to the victims of the Hiroshima bombing is a complex one with no easy answer. It is important to consider all of the perspectives on this issue in order to reach a well-rounded understanding.