One criticism of Anburey's work is that he was often uncritical of the British side in the war and dismissive of the American cause. For example, he portrayed the British army in a positive light while denigrating the American forces, describing them as untrained, undisciplined, and cowardly. This bias is evident throughout the book and may have influenced his interpretation of events.
Additionally, Anburey's account is based on his personal observations and experiences, which means that it is limited in scope and may not provide a comprehensive or representative view of the war or the United States as a whole. His travels were largely confined to the eastern seaboard, and he did not have extensive contact with the wider population or experience the full range of perspectives that existed during that time.
Furthermore, it is important to consider the context in which Anburey wrote his book. He was writing in the aftermath of the war, when tensions between Britain and the United States were still high. His account may have been influenced by the prevailing political climate and his desire to justify British actions during the conflict.
In light of these criticisms, it is important to read Anburey's account critically and to consider other sources and perspectives when studying the American Revolutionary War and the United States in the late 18th century. While his book provides valuable insights and observations, it is not entirely unbiased or comprehensive, and it should be used in conjunction with other sources to ensure a well-rounded understanding of the period.