History of Asia

Beautiful Slave Iltutmish of Central Asia

A beautiful boy was born to a Muslim of the Alberi caste in Turkistan, Central Asia. He was named Altmash (or Iltutmish). In adolescence, her beauty became even brighter, due to which her own brothers roasted water from her physical beauty and sold her to a horse trader on the pretext of showing a herd of horses.

Historian Purushottam Nagesh Oak writes, “Altamash was a handsome boy. This physical attraction was not a boon under Muslim rule; Because he used to be attacked by male-beggars. If somewhere that physical beauty used to fall in the storm of buying and selling, then the basis of its pricing was male-bhog. Along with this, the burden of domestic work was also burdened on him.”

After enjoying Kishore Iltutmish, the horse dealer sold him to a local resident in Bukhara. Then Haji Bukhari bought it from that resident. In this way Iltutmish Jamaluddin Chasht, who was a slave trader, came to the Kaaba, selling like marketable goods. His sharp business eyes saw that this beautiful boy could get a good price if it was sold to the luxuriant, drunkard and alcoholic like Muhammad Ghori.

Licking her beauty with his sensual eyes, Muhammad Ghori cost her a thousand pure gold dinars, but Jamaluddin did not accept to sell her at this price. Angered by this profiteering, Ghori stopped the purchase of Iltutmish. Frustrated Jamaluddin had to employ him in the work of psi (horse care) and he was engaged in that work for three years.

Meanwhile, Jamaluddin tried to increase his beauty by feeding him and making him fleshy and one day he made him stand in the market of Ghazni. But no one dared to buy him because of the Ghori's ban being in force. Everyone stood and kept licking it with sly eyes. Then Jamaluddin knocked on the door of every luxurious Muslim to sell this item but it did not sell.

At the same time, Muhammad Ghori's slave henchman Qutubuddin also came to Ghazni. The responsibility of plundering and slaughtering the infidels in India was now on his shoulder. The plundered goods from India were reaching Ghori through him. To fill his male and female harems, he could buy any human food he wanted. Therefore, when Ghori asked permission to buy Qutubuddin Iltutmish's beauty, Ghori could not refuse his request but ordered him to go to Delhi. It is known that Muhammad Ghori had bought his slave Qutubuddin from the same merchant of slaves, Jamaluddin Chasht Kaaba.

Historian Purushottam Nagesh Oak writes, "In the last days of his life, Muhammad Ghori was badly defeated by the Hindus in the battle of Andkhud. The Gakhar caste had broken his back. Even the combined army of his slave Qutubuddin could not do anything. In these poor days, when Ghori was running from one end to the other like a mad dog in fear of the reorganized Hindu forces, he enjoyed the companionship of Altamasha (Iltutmish). He probably complained to Ghori about Qutubuddin's sexuality, because he asked Qutbuddin to behave well with Altamasha and then ordered him to be freed from slavery."

Qutbuddin made Iltutmish the hero of the bodyguards. According to Tabaqat-e-Nasiri, Qutubuddin always kept it with him. Later, Iltutmish also stayed with him in various campaigns against Hindus and in the destruction and loot of temples, due to which he started getting part and jagir in part of the loot.

Purushottam Nagesh Oak writes, “The reorganized Hindu forces, with great success, lightened the weight of the earth by breaking the backs of two human demons Ghori and Bakhtiyar Khilji at the same time, eliminating them. Their toxic jihadist breath had devastated and ruined Bharatvarsha from Ahinsthan (Afghanistan) to Varanasi and Bengal. Unfortunately still it was too late. Sardar Ghori of the Muslim evil party had left behind many sinful Muslim slaves. Their roots had gone deep in the holy land of India. Ghulam Qutubuddin, one of these sinful slaves, had just died (1210 AD) that his slave and son-in-law Iltutmish ascended the Hindu throne of Delhi, unholy by the Muslims."

According to Tabakate Nasiri, the Hindu chieftains in and around Delhi opposed him and after coming out of Delhi and gathering in a circular form, they raised the flag of rebellion. There was a battle between Iltutmish and the combined Hindu powers on the banks of the Yamuna, in which neither Iltutmish was victorious nor could the Hindu power overthrow him.

When Iltutmish was engulfed in conflicts in 1225 AD by attacking Lakhnauti in Bengal, he got information about the attempt by the Rajputs to capture Delhi taking advantage of their absence, he panicked and as soon as there was a treaty agreement he went to Delhi.

In 1226 AD, he attacked Ranthambore fort and returned after eating his mouth. In 1227 AD, he attacked the fort of Mandur, but here also he did not get success. Both these conclusions have been drawn by historian Purushotam Nagesh Oak on the basis of Tabakate Nasiri. He argues that whenever Muslim historians describe Muslim conquests, they are essentially (1) presenting a detailed description of the slaughter and plundering, (2) cleaning and cleaning all the temples with the blood of freshly harvested cows. Draw a picture of the work, and (3) appoint Muslim officers on the fort. But in the later descriptions of these two wars, this type of description has not been given by the historian Minhaj-ul-Siraj.

In 1229-30, Iltutmish again attacked Bengal but probably this time also he did not get success. After this he raided Gwalior and failed. Frustrated with the effort of conquering Gwalior, Iltutmish turned his eyes to other victims. He attacked Bhilsa Nagar near Bhopal. Minhaj-ul-Siraj writes, “There was a temple there which took three hundred years to build. Iltutmish smashed him."

After looting and destroying Bhilsa, Iltutmish proceeded towards Ujjain. There he destroyed and corrupted the temple of Lord Mahakal. Minhaj-ul-Siraj writes, "Ujjain had a grand statue of King Vikramaditya, who ruled 1319 years before Iltutmish's (1234 AD) invasion of Ujjain and it was this King Vikram who ran the Hindu era."

It is known that Minhaj-ul-Siraj is talking about the same King Vikramaditya of Ujjain, who has been declared a mythical character by the imperialist and his slave leftist historian.

Purushottam Nagesh Oak writes, “Iltutmish uprooted the Shivling of Mahakal and brought it to Delhi. There were also some copper statues as well. What he did to all this is unknown. But seeing the dark exploits of medieval Muslim jihadis, it can be easily inferred that he must have fixed them in the steps of Hindu temples converted into mosques.

Aurangzeb has also installed the idol of Lord Shri Krishna, revered in his birthplace, in the steps of the Central Mosque of Agra. This mosque was also an ancient Rajput palace. The religious places of Lord Krishna's Shiksha Niketan, Sandipani Ashram and the monastery of the devotee poet Bhartrihari etc. Ujjain were also crushed by the Muslims with their hammers."

In 1236 AD Iltutmish fell ill and died in April. He was buried in a cellar of the same temples in the Dhruva Stambh complex of Mehrauli, where the devil Qutubuddin had destroyed 27 temples including the Vishnu temple.

Historian Purushottam Nagesh Oak writes, "The Archaeological Department should clear all the mess in this room and make arrangements for lighting in the basement so that the tourists themselves can see that these Muslim invaders and robbers are not in their own tombs, but in the crypts of Hindu offerings and temples. I am sleeping soundly.”