Is it true that Strong nationalism often hindered negotiations between world leaders?

Strong nationalist sentiments can indeed obstruct negotiations between world leaders. When nationalistic sentiments run high, leaders prioritize the interests and narratives of their own countries rather than engaging in collaborative negotiations. This can result in a lack of compromise, increased tensions, and a breakdown in communication.

- Resistance to concessions: Strong nationalistic sentiments may make leaders less willing to make concessions or find middle ground in negotiations. This can lead to stalemates and can even escalate conflicts.

- Increased rigidity in positions: Strong nationalistic sentiments can make it difficult for leaders to compromise their stated positions. This can result in a narrowing of diplomatic options and a reduction in the likelihood of reaching an agreement.

- Heightened sense of grievance: Strong nationalistic sentiments can contribute to a sense of grievance and victimization. This can make it more difficult for leaders to trust one another and to find common ground.

- Appeal to domestic audience: In some cases, leaders may use strong nationalist rhetoric as a way of appealing to their domestic audience. This can make them less likely to compromise on international issues, as they may feel they need to show strength and protect the interests of their own country.

Ultimately, strong nationalism can create an environment that is less conducive to effective negotiations and can make it more difficult to reach agreements and resolve disputes.