- Lack of feasibility: Plans may be criticized for being unrealistic or impractical, or for not considering all of the necessary factors.
- Lack of transparency: Plans may be criticized for being unclear or for not providing enough information about how they will be implemented.
- Lack of consensus: Plans may be criticized for not involving a wide enough range of stakeholders or for not adequately addressing their concerns.
- Lack of accountability: Plans may be criticized for not specifying who is responsible for implementing them or for not providing a way to track progress.
- Lack of sustainability: Plans may be criticized for not being sustainable over the long term, either financially or environmentally.
- Lack of innovation: Plans may be criticized for being unoriginal or for not offering any new ideas.
- Lack of vision: Plans may be criticized for lacking a clear vision or for not setting out a compelling direction for the future.
- Lack of flexibility: Plans may be criticized for being too rigid or for not allowing for changes in circumstances.
- Lack of ethics: Plans may be criticized for not taking into account ethical considerations or for not promoting the common good.
It is important to note that not all plans will be criticized for all of these reasons. Some plans may be criticized for only one or two reasons, while others may be criticized for many. The specific criticisms that are leveled at a particular plan will depend on the nature of the plan and the context in which it is being developed.