Northern Perspective:
- Northerners viewed both the three-fifths rule and the existence of slavery as morally questionable and unjust.
Southern Perspective:
- Southerners were prepared to emphasize the logical implications of emancipation.
-They argued that if enslaved individuals were to be emancipated, they should remain in their current locations instead of being counted as two-fifths of a person for representation purposes.
The text suggests that the Southern argument highlights a potential inconsistency in the approach of Northerners, who found the three-fifths rule and slavery wrong but faced challenges in determining how to address the question of including emancipated individuals in society if they were no longer considered a fraction of a person.
It's important to note that the text does not delve into further details or provide context beyond these brief statements, so it does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the historical circumstances or broader viewpoints associated with the three-fifths rule, slavery, or the Northerners and Southerners' positions on these matters.