1. Rugged Individualism: Hoover held a strong belief in rugged individualism and the free market. He believed that individuals should take responsibility for their own well-being rather than relying on government intervention. This view contrasted sharply with the growing sentiment during the Great Depression that called for more active government involvement to address the crisis.
2. Limited Government Intervention: Hoover's policies centered around limited government intervention in the economy. He focused on providing financial assistance to businesses and banks rather than direct aid to individuals and relief programs for the unemployed. This approach proved insufficient in addressing the widespread economic hardships and did not resonate with voters.
3. Lack of Effective Response to the Depression: The Great Depression was one of the most severe economic crises in American history. Hoover's administration was criticized for its perceived slow and inadequate response to the deepening crisis. Voters felt that Hoover was out of touch with the suffering of millions of Americans and that his laissez-faire approach was exacerbating the situation.
4. Political Opposition and Popularity: Hoover's popularity had been declining even before the onset of the Great Depression due to factors like his reserved personality, conflicts with Congress, and unpopular policies. As the economic situation deteriorated, Hoover's approval ratings plummeted, and his political opponents capitalized on the public's dissatisfaction.
5. Contrast with Roosevelt: Hoover's political rival, Franklin D. Roosevelt, presented a stark contrast in terms of his approach to the Depression and his engagement with the public. Roosevelt campaigned on a platform of aggressive government action and won the presidential election in 1932, signaling the rejection of Hoover's policies and the desire for more interventionist government reforms.
In summary, voters did not embrace Hoover's ideas on the government's role during the Great Depression due to his belief in rugged individualism, limited government intervention, the perceived inadequacy of his policies in addressing the crisis, his declining popularity, and the contrast between his approach and that of his political opponent.