Argument: Women are not physically strong enough for certain jobs.
Counterargument: Although it's true that, on average, men have greater upper-body strength than women, there are plenty of jobs that don't require a lot of physical strength. Besides, women's suffrage doesn't just mean women must do or can do any job that men do; it means that women should have the same opportunities as men when it comes to choosing a job or occupation.
Argument: Women are too emotional to make rational decisions.
Counterargument: Emotions can be beneficial in decision-making because they can provide us with information about what's important to us and what the consequences of our decisions might be. Besides, there is no evidence to suggest that women are any more emotional than men.
Argument: Women's place is in the home, not the workplace.
Counterargument: This argument relies on a traditional view of women's roles that is no longer applicable in modern society. Many women today choose to work outside the home, and they should have the same rights as men when it comes to employment. Besides, unpaid care work like house chores, taking care of children, and looking after elderly parents is equally important and should not be seen as less valuable than paid employment.
Argument: Women don't need equal rights because they are already protected by men.
Counterargument: This argument assumes that women are the property of men and that men are responsible for taking care of them. Women are not property, and they should not have to rely on men for protection. They should be able to stand on their own two feet and have the same rights and opportunities as men.
Argument: Women's suffrage will lead to the downfall of society.
Counterargument: There is no evidence to support this claim. In fact, women's suffrage has been shown to have a positive impact on society. For example, studies have shown that women's suffrage has led to increased economic growth, reduced crime rates, and improved maternal and child health.