data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a6a9/8a6a9d1db7e9c0a856786d3d4e19bc3bf1d6035e" alt=""
The Creole began his studies at the Royal Seminary of Nobles in Madrid, a place of training for the children of the nobles and the military, although other sources rule out that he went through this elite school. To enter it was necessary "to prove to be sonsdalgo notorious according to the laws of Castile, clean of blood and of mechanical trades by both lines". What is certain is that on July 21, 1789, at the age of eleven, José de San Martín began his military career as a cadet in the Murcia Regiment, where he entered claiming to be the son of a captain. His military career began in the battles against the Moors in Melilla and Orán. When he was still a young beardless soldier he was added to the artillery battery of Captain Luis Daoiz, later one of the heroes of Dos de Mayo in Madrid. . Before the War of Independence, the young Creole had already fought against the French in the Pyrenees and against the Portuguese in the War of the Oranges (1802). In a recruitment mission he was seriously injured by some thugs who tried to take a suitcase with three thousand reals of fleece, an amount from the militia. All this without forgetting his time on the frigate Santa Dorotea, which formed a squad in the Mediterranean against the Barbary corsairs . During this naval period he met Napoleon in Toulon, when he was sent on behalf of "La Dorotea". The fact that the emperor greeted him influenced the admiration that San Martín always professed for the Corsican as a genius of war. In 1804, his promotion to Second Captain at the age of 27 forced him to change units. In the “Campo Mayor Volunteers” battalion, which was in Cádiz, he met General Francisco María Solano Ortiz de Rosas, Marquis of Socorro. They were both Americans. Solano, a man of liberal ideas, warmly and sympathetically welcomed his young compatriot whom he helped and advised from experience. And both shared a pessimistic view of the future of Spain and her government in the American territories. They both felt that the Motherland was teetering on his feet.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f0ab/3f0ab9a92a93cda88ce11f757362cd09fdaf1ada" alt=""
The strange departure of the Spanish Army The attempts at revolution that took place in Caracas and Buenos Aires in 1810 convinced him – or so say his biographers who are more permeable to the myth – that he should go to his homeland as soon as possible to take sides with his own. To tell the truth, there was nothing American about the Spanish officer, except for his place of birth. His were the members of the Spanish Army. He had spent his life outside the continent, his physical appearance was European and his accent was markedly Andalusian. José de San Martín asked to be discharged from the Spanish armed institutions to attend to “family matters in Lima”, which was a lie, and he was definitively convinced. of which side he wanted to be on when the imminent collapse of the Spanish Empire caught them all under. His was rather a liberal reverie above an independentist one. The Creoles organized themselves. On September 12, 1812, he married María de los Remedios Escalada, the teenage daughter of a powerful family of American aristocracy, in Buenos Aires. Her family was rich, prestigious and in favor of the rebellion, which meant an economic jump for José de San Martín, whose only fortune was the one he had managed to accumulate during his career at the service of the Spanish Empire. In fact, his wife's family called him "the soldier" and sometimes "the Andalusian", because he played the guitar and spoke in the manner of that land. In 1813, the Andalusian joined the rebel army at the head of a body of elite fighter, the Horse Grenadiers, who became known in their victory at San Lorenzo, preventing the landing of a royalist army. Without a doubt, the talent and military experience of someone like San Martín were going to be crucial in bringing down the last bastion of the Spanish Empire in South America:the land sown by Pizarro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70733/70733a3088dd1f0bc31cf3c85b6557be63d7ac2d" alt=""
Bolívar or nothing! San Martín's string of victories led the liberal government established during the Liberal Triennium in Spain to negotiate a peace with the Latin American rebels. However, when the talks broke down, the liberator resumed the armed struggle and occupied Lima on July 6, 1821 with the title of Protector. He expelled thousands of Spaniards notoriously anti-independence and confiscated their property. On a political level he established freedom of trade and freedom of the press, but did not allow religious worship other than Catholic. The Liberator hoped during his protectorate to be able to complete the independence of the national territory and prepare the way for the establishment of a constitutional monarchical regime, which has led some to maintain that the government of San Martín was a dictatorship. The type of State that should being established in Peru generated a gap between the supporters of a monarchy and those of a republic. For monarchists like San Martín, the republic was not the most convenient form of government for Peru due to the large extension of its territory and the poor education of the country's masses. He knew better than anyone how savage a people could be in the event of anarchy, and that is why he wanted a kingdom for Peru preferably led by a European Prince, the Infante of Castile if possible. An old idea that the Bourbons themselves had weighed in the past:a kind of Hispanic kingdoms led by the members of the dynasty. Not in vain, the form of government of Peru and the rest of the new states that were emerging was one of the topics discussed by San Martín and Simón Bolívar, the great leader of the Corriente Libertadora del Norte, during their meeting in Guayaquil on July 26, 1822. In this meeting, Bolívar was not very convinced that San Martín was in favor of a democratic republic. José Acedo Castilla considers in his study “The political performance of the general” that San Martín believed that “bringing the most uneducated to the Government and giving them prominence was a political disaster.” Bolívar himself maintained that the liberator of Peru “did not believe in democracy, being convinced that those countries could only be ruled by vigorous governments, which enforced compliance with the Law, since when men do not obey it voluntarily, there is no choice but force. In short, San Martín was a product of the liberal ideas of his time:a liberal constitutionalist, who conceived the Government in strong and clean hands and "not given over to the ignorance, envy, resentment and desire for profit of certain people ». Education had to come before democracy. When San Martín offered him the leadership of the liberating campaign in Peru, Bolívar made him understand that he would only accept it if he withdrew from Peru. Either Bolívar or nothing!
A voluntary exile and nostalgia for Spain Upon his return to Lima, San Martín was clear that he had to leave the way to Bolívar free. His time as a liberator, now that his military side was no longer needed, was coming to an end. This plan accelerated when he learned on his return that the people of Lima had captured and expelled Bernardo Monteagudo, his right-hand man in government and another defender of the monarchy. With great difficulty, the Argentine managed to reunite the First Constituent Congress, which from the beginning was controlled by the liberal republicans. The same day of his installation (September 20, 1822) San Martín presented his irrevocable resignation to all the public positions he held. With the Spanish still controlling some provinces, Peru needed Bolívar's troops if it wanted to carry the independence process to port. . His parting words had that tragic air so characteristic of betrayed heroes:«The presence of a lucky military man, no matter how selfless he may have, is fearsome to the newly constituted States. On the other hand, I'm already tired of hearing that I want to become sovereign. However, I will always be ready to make the ultimate sacrifice for the freedom of the country, but in a simple private class and no more.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a9d2/2a9d216cbe84b68e74cefd101fc25f43079be66b" alt=""
SOURCE:http://www.abc.es/historia/