1. Securing Independence: In some cases, violence can be perceived as a last resort when peaceful negotiations and diplomatic efforts fail to achieve independence. Historically, violence has played a significant role in securing independence for oppressed nations or groups seeking self-determination.
2. Mobilization and Solidarity: Violence can also serve as a catalyst for mobilizing people within an independence movement. It can create a sense of urgency and unite diverse groups in a common cause. The collective experience of struggle and sacrifice can foster a strong sense of solidarity among the members of an independence movement.
3. Raising International Awareness: In certain situations, violence can garner international attention and support for an independence movement. Media coverage of violent conflicts and human rights abuses can put pressure on governments and international organizations to intervene or take diplomatic action.
4. Empowerment and Agency: For oppressed or marginalized communities, violence can sometimes provide a sense of agency and empowerment. The act of resisting and fighting for their rights and self-determination can be seen as a form of liberation.
5. Deterrence and Strategic Gain: In some instances, violence can be employed as a strategic tactic to deter or counter an oppressive regime's military force or occupation. It can serve as a way to gain leverage in negotiations or create conditions that increase pressure for political concessions.
It is crucial to emphasize that violence should not be glorified or seen as a desirable means to achieve independence. Nonviolent resistance, peaceful negotiations, and diplomatic efforts should always be considered first and foremost. Violence often leads to loss of innocent lives, lasting trauma, and prolonged conflicts. In seeking independence, it is essential to prioritize dialogue, human rights, and sustainable solutions that promote reconciliation, justice, and peace.