After the death of Iltutmish, the beautiful slave of Central Asia, his daughter Razia was successful in grabbing power due to her beauty, but the chieftains who did not fall in love with her were not ready to accept a woman as their sultan. Initially, he tried to ensure his safety by tying his steely Abyssinian stablemate Ghulam Amluddin in the guise of love, but could not stay safe for long.
Meanwhile, the chief of Tabarhind, Altunia, revolted against Razia. Historian Purushottam Nagesh Oak writes, "In April 1940, Razia left Delhi to suppress his rebellion, but in front of his party force and deceit, he did not get one. Altunia locked her in the basement of Tabarhind and raped her. Razia had to hand over her entire army to her as his mistress."
Here Razia left Delhi, while her harem brother Muizuddin Bahram Shah declared himself Sultan. Then Altunia, who dreamed of capturing the throne of Delhi, fought against Bahram Shah with the combined army of Razia but was defeated. Both of them were killed and thrown on the side of the road in October 1240. The roof-bed body of Razia is buried in a dilapidated grave on the side of the road inside the Turkman Gate of Delhi.
In 1243 AD, the rebel courtiers also killed Bahram Shah and one of the forty chief slaves, Balban, declared himself Sultan but no one supported him but Iltutmish's grandson Alauddin was removed from prison and placed on the throne and Vazir. After becoming Nizamulmulk took command in his own hands. Other courtiers conspired and killed Nizamulmulk on 30 October 1242.
Alauddin also could not last long. He was dragged into prison by the courtiers in June 1246 AD and then made halal and sent a secret invitation to the vassal vassal Nasiruddin Mahmud of Bahraich to become the Sultan. Historian Minhaj-ul-Siraj writes that he fought many battles with the infidels (Hindus, Buddhists). He reached Delhi from Bahraich wearing a Delhi burqa as a woman who was declared Sultan on 10 June 1246 AD.
Hero of the Left, Nasiruddin Mahmood
This same devil Nasiruddin Mahmud has been shamelessly praised by leftist historians with various words like noble, generous, virtuous, noble, kind etc. Whose lies and deceit has been exposed completely by Muslim historian Minhaj that Siraj himself.
Left historian Ashirdilal Srivastava writes about Nasiruddin Mahmud, "Nasiruddin was a simple, devoid of evils, living a simple life and not harassing anyone." Some other leftist historians have even described it as a feeder by sewing a hat and writing the Koran, but the reality was that it was also low, cruel, violent, murderer, kidnapper and a victim like other Muslim rulers. Yes, it was definitely weak due to over-dependence on the courtiers.
Shaitan Nasiruddin Mahmud
Describing the exploits of Nasiruddin Mahmud, Minhaj-ul-Siraj writes, “(Nasiruddin's general) Ulugh Khan (Balban) and some other court nobles, along with the royal army and their followers, suddenly launched an expedition into the (Himalayan) hills. They decided… they unexpectedly lashed out at the opponents (Hindus)… all the people were cut off with swords and thrown away… the villages and settlements of the hill people were surrounded and ruined… they were all put to death. The soldiers who brought beheadings received a silver tanka reward for each head. The soldier who caught the alive Hindu used to get two tanks. The Afghans of a party consisting of three thousand horsemen and footmen…were very courageous and courageous. In fact, all the nobles, heroes, Turks and Tajiks of the army showed great valor and bravery. His best exploits will live on in history forever."
“Hindus fleeing on camels were caught along with their children and families. 250 heroes and chieftains of enemies (Hindus) were taken prisoner. 50,000 tanks were found near Pahari Ranas and Rais of Sindh. It was sent to the royal treasury. Ulugh Khan (Balban) came to the court with many of his heroes and nobles. After staying in the capital for two days, the court went there again…with a message of vengeance. The elephants were groomed. The Turks hone their sharp swords. Many people were thrown under the feet of elephants on the royal orders. The sharp Turks cut the bodies of the Hindus into two pieces. About 100 people died at the hands of skin strippers. Their skin was peeled from head to toe. Then they were filled with straw. Some skins filled with straw were hung at each door of the city. The courts of Delhi would never have imagined such punishment; No one has ever heard such a horror story."
Agitated by this purposeless bloodshed and brute massacre and loot and destruction of the quiet hills, the Hindus also took the same revenge. On hearing this news, Commander Ulugh Khan “Walked fast towards the hills and… again by suddenly attacking those who raised their heads (Hindus) and imprisoned them all. Their number was twelve thousand. Among them were all men, women and children. All these valleys, hills and encircled prisoners were crushed and cleared. A lot of loot was also found in it. Millions of thanks to Allah for this great victory of Islam."
shamelessness of sly leftist historians
Left historian Harishchandra Varma writes on page 140 of Medieval India Part-I, “The texts of the then historians, such as Minhaj-us-Siraj, Ziauddin Barani, Shams-e-Siraj Afiq, Yahya-bin-Ahmad Sirhindi etc. It is full of depictions of destruction and idol-breaking. But the same man writes on the same page, "By banning idolatry, the Ottoman rulers taught the Hindus to believe in one God." And then further in Delhi, the most cruel and great shaitan of the slave dynasty of Central Asia, Ulugh Khan aka Balban puts all his strength in the praise. In the entire ten-eleven pages, we have glorified the devil, whose pole we are going to uncover in the next article.
The question is, when the then Muslim historians openly describe the misdeeds of the emperors, who prove all Muslim rulers to be narcissists, blood vampires, violent, barbaric, murderers, kidnappers, rapists, idol destroyers, destroyers of temples and looters, then this sly Why do leftist historians present those devils as human beings and gods in front of the people of India? What is their vested interest and agenda in this? We have to understand this.
Other acts of the devil Nasiruddin Mahmud
Above, Minhaj-us-Siraj- has described only one incident. There are dozens like this.
The army of Nasiruddin, who went to fight the Mughals, fled in fear from the Mughals and started plundering the Jhelum and the adjoining areas of the Indus and collecting rent. Historian Minhaj that Siraj writes, “With his equipment and elephants, he had put his halt on the river Chenab. (His commander) Ulugh Khan (Balban) was destroying and destroying the hills of Jhelum and Jud by the mercy of Allah, giving hell to many Gakhars (Hindu caste) and rebel infidels (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain). After this they proceeded on the banks of the Indus and spread destruction in all the surrounding areas….On the way, by making a temple in the hills of Jalandhar a mosque, they read Eid-e-Azan in it.”
In the second year, Nasiruddin's army came to attack Panipat area and plunder, but the Jats killed him and drove him away. Nasiruddin then attacked a Hindu kingdom near Kannauj, whose capital was surrounded by Nandan ramparts, to protect the nose. Purushottam Nagesh Oak writes, “It was natural for male-eating Muslims to crack down on everything Hindu. It was their first and sacred duty to shatter the power of the infidels. There was a fierce battle, there was bloodshed but there was no victory. Had to compromise after taking something and retreat."
Nasiruddin then attacked Karra where his general, the vampire Ulugh Khan, wreaked havoc in vulnerable villages and towns. They looted houses by killing Hindus, Buddhists, kidnapping women. First made a Muslim then a slave."
He further writes, “Ulugh Khan now became so influential in the court that the Sultan had to marry his daughter to his son. So much money had to be paid in dowry that the treasury became empty again. To fill the empty treasury, the loot-killing campaign started again. Hindu houses were trampled across the Yamuna. In the earnings of this sin, the courtier Ju Huzuriye Minhaj that Siraj also got a share in the form of 100 Khar-Bhar."
In 1244 AD, Nasiruddin annihilated the Hindu regions of Bardar and Pinjore. At the time of plundering the city of Kaithal, he got the horrific massacre of Hindus and ordered his soldiers that "If any civilian escapes alive, then he should not forget this feat with freshness."
Referring to the attack on Mewat, Minhaj writes, “The Sultan appointed Ulugh Khan to punish these rebel (Hindu) residents of Mewat and their god (Hindu chieftain)…the valleys and passes were cleared, strong forts were taken. were taken and innumerable Hindus were drowned in the brutal torrents of the ruthless swords of the soldiers of Islam."
In another place Minhaj writes, “The sword of Ulugh Khan destroyed all the hills. He crossed the valleys of the hills and reached Salmur in an instant. Muslims looted it for the first time. Destruction spread all around. The opposing Hindus were cut in such a large number that their numbers could not be counted. Nor can it be described. (Page 356, Part II, Elliot and Dawson) Desperate to capture the power of Delhi, the great devil Balban poisoned the devil Nasiruddin Mahmud, from which he died in 1265-66.