History is the mirror of the future because our understanding of history determines the future of a nation and society. History is the account of our good and bad, right and wrong, successful and unsuccessful actions and its results. Only after proper analysis of these, national policy, diplomacy, war policy, social and administrative policies are made. The success and failure of the above policies depends on the extent to which the history of that state or nation has been properly analyzed.
That is why it is necessary that we do a proper analysis of the mistakes that happened in the history period of India, due to which the Hindu-Buddhist kingdom, which once extended up to the Arabian and Caspian Sea, has now become a secular India by shrinking into a small piece. In short, the Hindus who ruled most parts of Asia before Christianity, Islam, today have no Hindu country of their own. Why did this happen?
The Cushites, Semitic, Pagans of Arabia were the people of Vedic culture and the empire of Emperor Vikramaditya of India and his grandson Shalivahana was extended up to Arbasthan, the evidence of this is given in the article:"Hindu History of Pre-Islamic Arbasthan" which you can find in the link below. Can read on.
(Ancient India was extended up to Central Asia. Savitri, Satyavan, Madri, Kamboja were the people of Central Asia. The Midi, Huna, Shaka, Kushan etc. of Central Asia were Hindu people who believed in Vedic culture, the proof of this Next article Vedic History of Central Asia :Savitri, from Madri to the rise, spread and complete destruction of Buddhist kingdoms by Islamic invaders will be given respectively)
The rule of the Chakrabarti emperor Vikramaditya of Bharatvarsha extended up to Arabia. According to Vikramaditya's grandson Shalivahan Shaka or Shalivahan Parmar or historian Hemchandra Rai, the empire of Shalivahan Satavahana was also extended up to Arabia. Apart from this, evidence of Lalitaditya Muktapid and Bappa Rawal's empire reaching Asia Minor has also been found.
The pagan people of Arabia were Hindu and Buddhist people, there is also evidence of pre-Islamic Buddhist rule in Iraq. The question is that then what has happened to Amartyaveerputra Hindus that there is no Hindu nation left to say today! I have tried to find the answer of these questions on the basis of historical, social and religious-religious study in the following seven points which every Hindu should know so that this last little house of hundred crore Hindus "Hindustan" is saved permanently for the Hindus. to go.
Following are the 7 historical mistakes of Hindus, due to which the phased Islamization of India went on:
1. Tendency to not root out enemies
The biggest drawback of Hindu states after Christ was that they started fighting only protective wars. Despite having sufficient power and military force, he did not try to eliminate the invading enemies from the root. This defect among the Hindus was probably the result of the distorted propaganda of non-violence and Ashoka's policy of Dhamma. The result of this was that after the rise of Islam in Arabia and Islamization of Hindu and Buddhist states outside India, India also became a victim of Islamic invasion.
There is no doubt that warriors like Raja Chach, Dahir Sen, Bappa Rawal, Lalitaditya Muktapid, Mihir Bhoja were Paramvir, great rulers and supreme masters of warfare, and they rescued Islamic invaders for sixes, hit them as far as Arabia, and knelt down. But was forced. But the Muslim invaders were determined to attack non-Muslims as long as they were alive because of killing infidels (non-Muslims), dissolving Kufr (god idols etc.) and converting Dar-ul-Harb (non-Muslim state) to Dar-ul-Islam (Islamic state) This was his religion. But one day the death of mighty Hindu warriors like Rashtra Rakshak, Dharma Rakshak, Samaj Rakshak Raja Chacha, Bappa Rawal, Lalitaditya Muktapid, Mihir Bhoj was certain. Then until they find a permanent solution to the Islamic invasion, their success will be said to be incomplete.
Think of it,
Today, under the leadership of the Modi government, the Indian Army is ridding the sixes of Pakistanis, terrorists, jihadis, Chinese. But the question is how long will Modi stay and how long will the Modi government last? Such questions were neither considered then nor are they being considered now. Was the mighty king Dahir Sen less mighty? He had also got rid of sixes of Muslim invaders many times, but due to the betrayal of anti-incumbency political Buddhists, he was defeated and then everyone knows what a terrible orgy happened. Such political traitors were neither dealt with in time nor are they being dealt with now.
The correct strategy to avert these future disastrous consequences was that the Muslim invaders should not only be defeated, but they should have been driven into their homes and driven to Arabia. But this did not happen, the consequences of which the subsequent Indians were forced to suffer. Prithviraj Chauhan of the twelfth century was most infamous for this mistake as he left several times instead of eliminating the Muslim invaders who had come.
Yes, I will use the word infamous because when it comes to the security of the nation and the interest of the nation, then personal selfishness, arrogance and generosity should not matter. If Prithviraj Chauhan had not made this mistake out of ego or generosity, then today the picture of India would not have become so disgusting. Prithviraj Chauhan was guilty of violation of this standard and we should take a pledge to avoid any such mistake / leniency in future.
Unfortunately Hindu continued to suffer from this disease
When the Delhi Sultanate's warlord attacked the Saptagram of Hooghly in 1297 AD and oppressed the people there and King Man Nripati, then King Bhudev of Hooghly challenged Zafar Khan Ghazi and attacked and threw Zafar Khan Ghazi's head like a corn. Diya, Zafar Khan Ghazi's army fled by pressing its tail. The necessity was that they would chase after the fleeing army of Zafar Khan Ghazi and eliminate it from the holy land of Bengal, but failed to do so, as a result of which Bhudev was later defeated by his son Ughwan Khan. And the entire Hooghly became the possession of the Muslims. Until a few days ago, the world famous Vishnu temple of Triveni, Hooghly became "Zafar Khan Ghazi Masjid and Dargah".
2. Opposing the conversion of Hindus who were forcibly converted to Muslims
Just as Alexander the Great's dream of world conquest had bowed before India, in the same way the victory chariot of Islam had also bowed before the heroes of India. The Arab invaders had occupied Sindh, Multan and parts of present-day Afghanistan for some time. was captured. Lalitaditya Muktpid of the Karkotak dynasty in Kashmir could not raise the eyes of the Arabs towards Kashmir for centuries. He killed the Arabs by driving them to Arabia. The whole of India turned saffron once again but one problem remained.
That problem was the Muslims of Sindh and Multan forcibly made Muslims through violence, massacres and rapes by Arab invaders. They were also breathing a sigh of relief after being freed from Islamic terror, they also hated Islam because they were forcibly converted to Islam. They wanted to join the Sanatan Dharma of their ancestors back, but some contractors of the religion stood as a wall between Sanatan Dharma and them. The foolishness of some Hindus blocked the way for their return. Historian PN Oak writes, "They were victims of foreign Muslim barbarism. He needed sympathy and support but was reprimanded. He was forced to take the side of the enemies of India."
This was the time when Christians and Muslims were forcibly converting non-religious people into their religion at the use of the sword. But here his own brothers and sisters who had become Muslims for some time due to the fear of forced death and rape of sisters and daughters and now wanted to return to Hinduism themselves, but some foolish Hindus were not ready to include them in theirs. After all, what was the fault of the Hindus who were forcibly converted to Muslims?
This was the second most dreadful and deadly foolishness of Hindus after the foolishness of Ahimsa Paramodharma. The result of this was that the descendants of those Muslims got frustrated and started looking for their history in the same barbaric invader Muslims. The result was that anti-India forces started growing within India, which Hindus could not eliminate due to Sanatan Sanskar. This is the reason that when the Turks attacked Sindh after two and a half hundred years, the Muslim converts of Sindh welcomed and supported the invaders, due to which the Turks had a permanent right over Sindh.
Hindus repeated the same mistake in Kashmir
The reason for Islamization of Kashmir, Rinchin Buddhist was also a victim of this foolishness of the Hindus. When Rinchin wanted to leave Buddhism and convert back to Hinduism, some foolish Brahmins opposed him and in anger he became a Muslim and paved the way for the Muslim invasion of Kashmir. Which ultimately culminated in the Islamization of Kashmir, the land of Brahmins, a heaven on earth.
Then, in 1848, in the court of Maharaja Gulab Singh of Jammu and Kashmir, thousands of Muslim men and women, with great hope, purify themselves and their families, citing the atrocities committed by Muslim invaders, terrorists and forced conversions. Prayed to take him back to his beloved Hindu religion, but due to the stupidity of the foolish priest, this social salvation could not be done. The result was that the converted Hindus were now forced to consider themselves Muslims and as the converted Kashmiri Muslims forgot their Hindu history, the foundation of Hindu-Muslim brotherhood began to weaken.
In 1931, under the leadership of Jihadi Sheikh Abdullah, the great-grandson of Hindu Balmukund Kaul, some people started killing, plundering Hindus for power and then heaven on earth, crown of India, Kashmir of Brahmins, anti-Hindu, anti-India stronghold of Islamic jihadists Done.
Now converted Hindus, Buddhists started creating terror
Alaptagin became a Muslim ruler of such converted Hindus in Khorasan of India. His ancestor was Samanid Kshatriya proud of Hindutva and he was a ruler under him in Khorasan. He made Subuktagin the general. Now only Hindus who became Muslims started attacking Afghanistan and parts of India continuously to make India an Islamic state. The same Subuktagin had a malevolent son, Mohammad Ghaznavi, who attacked India many times, looted the temples, killed Hindus, Buddhists, took the women and girls here captive to Ghazni and took them as sex slaves for two rupees. Sold in.
3. Non-violent Buddhist kingdoms surrender without resistance
The phrase “Ahimsa Paramoddharmaha” is from Mahabharata and this declaration is made by Mahabali Bhima. You will say that how Bhima, who killed thousands of people and drank his blood after tearing the chest of Dushasan, is declaring non-violence as the biggest religion? In fact, non-violence in Sanatan culture means not to do unnecessary violence and not to hurt or kill innocent creatures. Mahatma Buddha's non-violence also meant the same thing, but Ashoka's foolish Dhamma policy and his followers turned non-violence into a curse like cowardice, impotence, due to which they became victims of Islamic violence, from Arabia to Pakistan, Kashmir to the whole and this India and India. Also ended in Bangladesh.
Non-violent Buddhist states proved completely incapable of countering Islamic violence. They were easily annihilated by Islamic invaders in Arabia, Iraq, Samarkand, Kurgan, Turfan, Kabul, Bamiyan, Kafiristan, Swat, Bajur, Kashmir etc. or were forced to surrender and become Muslims. His peace-loving, non-violent women became the machines used by Muslims to create violent jihadists. As a result, the Buddhist kingdom was destroyed by the Islamic invaders, but it also affected the Hindu states. And in the states where Buddhist population was in abundance, the situation became even more dire because non-violent Buddhists were not only easily killed, but also became Muslims out of fear and supported the Hindus against the Hindu states and the Hindus, due to which the Hindu state would also be defeated. Gone.
To understand this point in detail, read the article on the link below - "How the rise of Islam destroyed Buddhism and Buddhists from Arabia to Bangladesh."
4. Hindu crusade vs Islamic deceit war
Even when the states of India used to fight among themselves, they used to follow the standards of crusade. वे निर्दोष जनता की हत्या नहीं करते थे, स्त्रियों का अपहरण और बलात्कार नहीं करते थे, बच्चों का कत्लेआम नहीं करते थे, खेत खलिहान नष्ट नहीं करते थे, नदी, सरोवर, कुआँ तालाबों में जहर नहीं मिलाते थे, रात्रि में सोये हुए सैनिकों पर अचानक हमला नहीं करते थे, युद्ध जीतने केलिए छल कपट का सहारा नहीं लेते थे आदि.
पर मुस्लिम आक्रमणकारी उपर्युक्त सभी कुकर्म करते थे और इससे भी अधिक हिंसा, नीचता का परिचय देते थे. वे निर्दोष आम नागरिकों का कत्लेआम कर उनके सिरों का पहाड़ बना उत्सव मनाते थे, स्त्रियों और बच्चियों का बलात्कार करते थे, उनकी छातियाँ नोच डालते, उनका अपहरण कर सेक्स गुलाम बनाकर जिहादी पैदा करते थे या सेक्स गुलाम के रूप में बेच देते थे. वे हिन्दुओं, बौद्धों का सिर्फ कत्ल नहीं करते थे बल्कि तड़पा तड़पाकर मारते या बलात्कार करते थे ताकि आम नागरिक डर से मुसलमान बनकर हिन्दू बौद्ध राजा के विरुद्ध उनका साथ देने केलिए तैयार हो जाएँ या हिन्दू, बौद्ध राज्य अपनी जनता को बचाने केलिए आसानी से आत्मसमर्पण कर दे. यही कारण है कि मुसलमानों द्वारा किला फ़तेह होने से पहले ही हिन्दू औरतें जौहर कर लेती थी.
इस्लामिक आक्रमणकारियों की बर्बरता
कहा जाता है जब मोहम्मद कासिम सिंध पर कब्जा करने में लगा था उस समय कराची (देवल) से बगदाद और दमिश्क जाने वाली सडक पर हिन्दू, बौद्ध स्त्रियों, बच्चों और मनुष्यों की हड्डियाँ बिखरी पड़ी रहती थी. हिन्दुओं, बौद्धों का एक नये प्रकार के खूंखार नरपिशाचों से मुकाबला था जिसके लिए वे मानसिक और धार्मिक रूप से तैयार नहीं थे क्योंकि सनातन संस्कार हिन्दुओं, बौद्धों को उनके जैसा नरपिशाच बनने की इजाजत नहीं देता था. परिणाम यह होता की हिन्दू राज्य कमजोर पड़ जाते और उनसे समझौता करने की कोशिश करते और मारे जाते या जिसकी परिणति राज्य के इस्लामीकरण में होती थी.
इस्लामिक आक्रमणकारियों का छल-कपट
मुसलमानों की अधिकांश जीत छल-कपट और नृशंस हिंसा-बलात्कार से ही हुई थी इसके सैकड़ों उदाहरन भरे पड़े हैं. राजा दाहिर सेन भी इसी छल-कपट के शिकार हुए थे. क़ासिम ने छल से अपने कुछ सैनिकों को रात के समय औरतो के वेश में स्थानीय औरतों के झुण्ड में दाहिर की सेना के पास भेजा. रोती बिलखती आवाजो के कारण राजा दाहिर उनकी मदद के लिए आए और कासिम ने अंधेरे का फायदा उठा कर अकेले दाहिर पर हमला बोल दिया. दाहिर हजारों हत्यारो के बीच लड़ते रहे और वीरगति को प्राप्त किये.
Rani Bai, the second wife of Raja Dahir, fought fiercely with Qasim's army with her son Jaisimha from the fort of Berhamnabad. कासिम की सेना में नये बने मुसलमान जो कल तक दाहिर को अपना राजा मानते थे वे भी जुड़ गये थे. मुसलमानों ने फसलें जला दी. जलाशयों में जहर घोल दिया. पर बात नहीं बनी तो एकबार फिर छल से काम लिया और कुछ गद्दारों ने किले का फाटक रात्रि को खोल दिया और फिर किले पर कब्जा कर १६००० लोगों का नरसंहार किया गया. यहीं से दाहिर की दो पुत्रियों सुर्यदेवी और परिमल देवी को बंदी बनाकर ख़लीफा वालिद के पास भेज दिया था.
कासिम की सेना के राओर और बरह्मणाबाद की ओर जाते ही दाहिर का पुत्र फूफी ने राजधानी आलोर पर पुनः अधिकार कर लिया था. फूफी की सेना में एक अरबी मुसलमान भी नौकरी करता था. उसने एक रात कासिम केलिए नगर का द्वार खोल दिया और नगर पर पुनः कासिम का अधिकार हो गया. इतिहासकार पुरुषोत्तम नागेश ओक लिखते हैं, “सभ्य और सीधे-सादे हिन्दुओं ने कभी यह नहीं सोचा था कि उनकी सेना में एक भी मुसलमान का होना देशद्रोह और विश्वासघात के सांप को दूध पिलाना होगा.”
यह सिर्फ एक इस्लामिक हमले और उनके जीत के तरीके का उदाहरन है, ऐसे सैकड़ों हैं. सीरिया के जीत की कहानी भी इसी तरह शर्मनाक थी. मुसलमानो ने सीरिया के ईसाई सैनिकों के आगे अपनी औरतों को कर दिया. मुसलमान औरते गयी ईसाइयों के पास की मुसलमानो से हमारी रक्षा करो, ईसाइयों ने इन धूर्तो की बातों में आकर उन्हें शरण दे दी. फिर क्या था, सारी जिहादन औरतों ने मिलकर रातों रात सभी ईसाई सैनिकों को हलाल करवा दिया. आगे भी मुसलमानों की लगभग सभी जीत इसी प्रकार के छल कपट के कारण होती गयी क्योंकि हिन्दू, बौद्ध राज्य मुसलमानों के छल-कपट, हिंसा, लूट और बलात्कार के जिहादी संस्कार को समझने में असफल रहे.
हिन्दू बौद्ध मंदिरें मुस्लिम आक्रमणकारियों के हथियार
इसी प्रकार मुसलमान हिन्दुओं, बौद्धों, जैनों के मन्दिरों को भी नष्ट भ्रष्ट कर देते थे, देवी देवताओं की मूर्तियों का अपमान करते और नष्ट कर देते थे. यह भी मुस्लिम आक्रमणकारियों का हिन्दू बौद्ध राज्यों को आत्मसमपर्ण कराने का एक हथियार था. इसका एक दूसरा रूप यह भी था कि मुस्लिम आक्रमणकारी जिस इलाके पर कब्जा कर लेते उन इलाकों के हिन्दू बौद्ध जनता के जान और अस्मत का सौदा करने के साथ बड़े बड़े मन्दिरों का भी सौदा हिन्दू राज्यों से करते थे.
जैसे सिंध क्षेत्र पर मुसलमान जब सिंध के धर्मान्तरित मुसलमानों की मदद से दूसरी बार अधिकार करने में सफल हुए तो हिन्दू शाही वंश, गुर्जर प्रतिहार आदि इतने सक्षम थे कि उन्हें सिंध क्षेत्र से पुनः मार भगाते परन्तु मुसलमान धमकी देते की अगर उनपर हमला किया गया तो मुल्तान का सूर्यमंदिर और स्थानेश्वर का चक्रपाणी मन्दिर, जो काशी और सोमनाथ के मन्दिरों की तरह ही विशाल और अंतरराष्ट्रीय तीर्थ स्थल था, उसे नष्ट कर देंगे. परिणामतः हिन्दू राज्य उनपर हमला नहीं कर पाते थे.
यह उनकी भारी भूल थी क्योंकि अब हम हिन्दुओं के पास न सिंध है, न ही मुल्तान का सूर्यमंदिर और स्थानेश्वर का चक्रपाणी मन्दिर. यदि खतरा उठाकर आक्रमणकारियों को जड़ से खत्म कर दिया होता तो और हजारों मन्दिर, मठ टूटने लुटने से बच जाते और अगर ये दो मन्दिर तोड़ भी दिए जाते तो सोमनाथ की तरह फिर से भारत की भूमि पर सीना ताने खड़ा हो जाते.
शेष अगले भाग में….